بررسی رابطه پراکنش جوامع گیاهی با ویژگیهای فیزیکی و شیمیایی خاک در لندفرم‌های سطح مخروط افکنه‌ها (مطالعه موردی: مخروط افکنه های جنوب غرب میامی)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری ژئومورفولوژی، گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران.

2 استاد گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران.

3 دانشیار گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران.

4 استادیار گروه زیست شناسی، دانشکده علوم و فناوری زیستی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران.

10.22034/gmpj.2020.118223

چکیده

بررسی کمّی روابط پوشش گیاهی و عوامل محیطی ابزاری ضروری در تحقیقات مدرن بوم‌شناسی پوشش گیاهی است. پژوهش حاضر به منظور شناخت و درک روابط اکولوژیک پوشش گیاهی مخروط افکنه‌های مورد مطالعه در جنوب غرب شهرستان میامی انجام شده است. بدین منظور 6 مسیر در شامل بالادست و پایین‌دست  سطوح فعال و غیرفعال مخروط افکنه‌ها انتخاب شد و در هر سایت (P1 تا P6) 1 ترانسکت 200 متری و در امتداد هر ترانسکت 8 پلات 8*8 متر در کانال‌های سطوح فعال، کانال‌های سطوح غیرفعال، میاناب‌ها و پشته‌های بالادست و پایین‌دست هر سه مخروط افکنه مستقر گردید. از این‌رو 44 پلات نمونه‌برداری از پوشش گیاهی انداخته شد. سپس در داخل هر پلات اقدام به شناسایی گیاهان و تهیه فهرست گونه‌های گیاهی شده، درصد و تراکم تاج پوشش هر گونه در پلات ثبت شد. همچنین 48 نمونه خاک از عمق 0 تا 20 سانتی‌متری برداشت شد و مورد آنالیز آزمایشگاهی قرار گرفت. پس از تعیین گونههای گیاهی غالب در لندفرمهای سطح مخروط افکنهها، با استفاده از تحلیل خوشه‌ای پوشش گیاهی منطقه به 4 گروه طبقه‌بندی شد. در گام آخر به منظور بررسی رابطه بین عوامل محیطی و پراکنش جوامع گیاهی از روش آنالیز مؤلفههای اصلی (PCA) استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که عوامل محیطی بر استقرار و پراکنش موزاییکی جوامع گیاهی مؤثر است و مهم‌ترین عوامل مؤثر بر تفکیک جوامع گیاهی درصد گراول یا رسوبات درشت، بافت خاک (درصد سیلت، درصد ماسه) و درصد نگهداشت آب در خاک میباشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Relationship between Distribution of Plant Societies with Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in landforms of alluvial fans (A Case Study on Alluvial Fans in Southwest Miami)

نویسندگان [English]

  • sepide imeni 1
  • Hasan Sadough 2
  • Shahram Bahrami 3
  • ahmadreza mehrabian 4
  • Kazem nosrati 3
1 Department of Natural Geography, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran
2 Professor of geomorphology, department of earth science, Shahid Beheshti university of Tehran
3 shahid beheshti university
4 Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Quantitative evaluation of the relationship between vegetation and environmental factors is an essential tool in the modern researches on vegetation ecology. The establishment of a plant community, changes in canopy cover percentage and plant density are influenced by soil, climatic, geomorphological and biological factors. Studying the above factors causes the distribution, density and variations of vegetation cover and habitat potential. Much of Iran has the arid, semi-arid or extremely arid climate. In most of these areas, vegetation is little and establishment of vegetation in these areas are associated with numerous restrictions. In addition, the distribution and density of vegetation on the land surface was not accidental, but rather the presence of different plant species in one habitat due to environmental factors (climate, soil, topography, etc.), ecological needs of each plant and tolerance range of each species. Relative to the environmental factors important in each habitat. In fact, by studying environmental characteristics using different statistical methods, the causes of plant community distribution are identified, the most important environmental factors affecting community distribution and the habitat's ability to adapt to other communities. Classification techniques are one of the multivariate statistical methods used in ecological knowledge in the last three decades. Ordering reveals the hidden in the collected data and also reduces the volume.
Methodology
Study area
The area under study has been located in the northeast of Semnan province, north of Shahroud city. The study area includes three alluvial fans including Saran, Moghatelan and Hot-Sokhteh.
Method
Impact alluvial fans are always one of the most prominent geomorphologic landforms with new, old, and even fossilized surfaces. Separation of old and new alluvial fans can be done based on indicators such as weathering, morphology, surface of alluvial fans, drainage patterns, color tone in satellite images.
Vegetation sampling
Field operations were carried out in early June 2019 with the aim of familiarizing with the area, collecting and identifying plants. In fact, at each site (P1 to P6) 1 transect of 200 m and along each transect 8 plots of 8 * 8 m were deployed on Interfluves, Swales, channels, Bar on toe and apex of all three alluvial fans. Therefore, 43 vegetation sampling plots were laid. Then, within each plot, plants were identified and list of plant species, percentage and canopy density of each species were recorded in the plot.
Soil sampling
In order to investigate physical and chemical characteristics of soil and their effects on the density and type of vegetation on alluvial fans; 48 soil samples from soil depths of 0-20 cm were collected from different landforms of old and young surfaces of alluvial fans, including bars, swales, channels, and interfluves. Also the amount of PH, EC, phosphorus (P), absorbable potassium (K) and sodium (Na), calcium carbonate (CaCO3), Saturation percentage (Sp), water retention capacity in the soil (WHC), soil texture, and total organic carbon (OCT) were measured.
Vegetation analysis
In this study, based on 13 physical and chemical properties of 44 quadrates, cluster analysis was performed and vegetation classification was performed by using PAST software.
Classification of environmental factors and vegetation Multivariate analysis of principal components (PCA) was performed using by PAST software. Principal components analysis was performed on 13 environmental factors including soil texture (sand, silt and clay content), acidity (pH), electrical conductivity (EC), organic matter content, saturation moisture content, soil water retention capacity in the soil, calcium carbonate, phosphorus, Potassium, sodium and percent of gravel or pebbles were determined.
Results and discussion
Plant species of study area
Overall, 32 families, 44 genuses, and 46 species were identified by field works in study area.
classification of Area vegetation
Using cluster analysis with Wards method and Euclidean distance index in PAST software showed that 44 plots in the study area belonged to 4 plant communities.
Results of Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
In order to determine the most important factors affecting the distribution of plant species, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on the data. Principal component analysis on 13 variables (soil properties) in 44 habitat (landforms) showed that the first, second, third, fourth and fifth axes were 47.66, 38.91, 7.72, 2.33 and 1.4 percentage of variance justifies the vegetation changes.
Conclusion
In the vegetation data analysis of the study area, using cluster analysis, four ecological groups of vegetation were separated which each ecological group represents a unique homogeneous unit of vegetation. Therefore, identification of plant groups and their location is very important in describing the variability of environmental conditions and can be an appropriate model in fitness management. Most of the active and inactive parts of the alluvial fan are located and in the parts where the amount of fine sediment is higher. In fact, soil saturation moisture and soil water retention capacity are the most important environmental limiting factors affecting plant residues in arid and semiarid regions. In the Miami due to chattels grazing, tractor movement to change land use and heavy machinery due to the presence of several factories in the study area, as well as unnecessary harvesting of medicinal and medicinal plants, in some parts of alluvial fans, especially alluvial fans of soil texture. It is being degraded and these are a serious threat to valuable and rare plant species in the region.
Keywords: Cluster analysis, Environmental factors, Ordination, Alluvial fan, Landform, Miami.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cluster analysis
  • Environmental Factors
  • Ordination
  • Alluvial fan
  • Miami
  • بهرامی، شهرام؛ بیرامعلی، فرشته؛ فیله کش، اسماعیل  و قهرمان، کاوه، 1397، بررسی تأثیر ژئومورفولوژی در نوع و تراکم پوشش گیاهی مخروط افکنه های فشتنق-  سبزوار، مجله جغرافیا و توسعه، شماره 52، صص 193- 210.
  • ترنج زر، حمید، 1383، بررسی عوامل بوم شناختی موثر بر پراکنش پوشش گیاهی در مراتع وشنوه قم، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران.
  • حمدی، محمدمهدی؛ ایرانبخش، علیرضا؛ اسدی، مصطفی، 1385، معرفی فلور، شکل‌های زیستی و کوروتیپ‌های گیاهان منطقه گرمسار در استان سمنان، مجله پژوهش و سازندگی، شماره 79، صص 179- 199.
  • طهماسبی، پژمان. 1390. رج بندی (تجزیه و تحلیل مؤلفه‌های چندمتغیره در علوم محیطی و منابع طبیعی)، انتشارات دانشگاه شهرکرد، 181 صفحه.
  • علی آبادی، عباس؛ توکلی، حسین، 1386، طرح شناخت مناطق اکولوژیک کشور، تیپ‌های گیاهی منطقه میامی، انتشارات موسسه تحقیقات جنگل‌ها و مراتع کشور، 81 صفحه.
  • فکری، عارف، 1396، مقایسه ترکیب و تنوع گونه ای در مراتع داخل و خارج قرق تحقیقاتی ارشق در استان اردبیل، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد گروه منابع طبیعی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، 76 صفحه.
  • قربانی، اردوان؛ نظری عنبران، فریبا؛ اصغری، علی؛ عظیمی معطم، فرزانه؛ مولایی، مریم، 1396، تاثیر برخی عوامل بوم شناسی در انتشار پوشش گیاهی واحد فیزیونومی علف بوته زار در گرادیان ارتفاعی فخر آبادی - شابیل (شمال سبلان)، نشریه حفاظت زیست بوم گیاهان، دوره 5، شماره 12، صص 215- 238.
  • کریمی، زهره، 1388، معرفی فلو ر، اشکال زیستی و پراکنش جغرافیایی گیاهان مراتع شهرستان دامغان، مجله علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دوره 16،  شماره 1، صص 1- 16.
  • متاجی، اسدالله.، 1382، طبقه بندی رویشگاه براساس جوامع گیاهی، ساختار توده و وضعیت فیزیکی و شیمیایی خاک در جنگل‌های طبیعی. پایان نامه دکتری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، 164 صفحه.
  • مصداقی، منصور. 1380. توصیف و تحلیل پوشش گیاهی، انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد، 287 صفحه.
  • محرابیان، احمدرضا؛ مرادی زیناب، حسین؛ نقی زاده، سیاوش؛ مصطفوی، حسین؛ خواجویی نسب، فرزانه، 1398، الگوهای انتشار، پهنه های تنوع و اولویت های حفاظتی جنس (Boraginaceae Juss.) Onosma L. در بخشی از واحدهای ژئومورفولوژیک شمال غرب ایران، فصلنامه علوم محیطی، شماره 1، صص 73- 94.
  • محرابیان، احمدرضا، 1394، الگوهای پراکنش و تنوع جنس Onosma در ایران با تاکید بر حفاظت، بوم زادی و الگوهای پراکنش در جنوب غرب آسیا، مجله رستنی ها، شماره 16، صص 36- 60.
  • مرادی، حمیدرضا؛ شکراللهی، شکوفه؛ دیانتی تیلکی، قاسمعلی، 1391، بررسی اثر ویژگی های خاک و عوامل فیزیوگرافی بر پوشش گیاهی (مطالعه موردی: بخشی از مراتع ییلاقی پلور)، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی تحقیقات مراتع و بیابان ایران، دوره 19، شماره 4، صص 668- 655.
    • Abd El-Ghani, M., Soliman, A. and Abd El-Fattahr, R., 2014. Spatial distribution and soil characteristics of the vegetation associated with common succulent plants in Egypt. Turkish Journal of Botany, 38, pp. 550-565.
    • Ahmad, S. and Yasmin, T., 2011. vegetation classification along Hanna lake, Baluchistn using ordination techniques, Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43 (2), pp. 683- 872.
    • Akbarlou, M. and Nodehi, N., 2015. Relationship between Some Environmental Factors with Distribution of Medicinal Plants in Ghorkhud Protected Region, Northern Khorasan Province, Iran,  Journal of raneland science Volume 6 , Number 1, pp. 63- 72.
    • Alaa M. M. and Mahgoub, A., 2019. The impact of five environmental factors on species distribution and weed community structure in the coastal farmland and adjacent territories in the northwest delta region, Egypt, Heliyon Journal, 16, 5(4), pp. 1- 33.
    • Assadi, M. 1984-2018. Flora of Iran. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands.
    • Azadi, H., Eghdami, Ha., Azhdari, G. and Lebailly, Ph., 2019. Impact of Land Use Changes on Soil and Vegetation Characteristics in Fereydan, Iran. Agriculture Journal, vol. 9 (3), pp. 1-17.
    • Bahrami, S., Fatemi Aghda, S.M., Bahrami, K., Motamedi Rad, M. and Poorhashemi, S., 2015. Effects of weathering and lithology on the quality of aggregates in the alluvial fans of Northeast Rivand, Sabzevar, Iran. Geomorphology, 241, pp. 19-30.
    • Brotherson, J.D., Rasmussen, l.l. and Black, R.D., 1986. Comparative habitate and community relationship of Atriplex confertifolia and Sarcobatus vermiculatus in central Utah, Great Basin Naturalist, 46(2), pp. 348-357.
    • Cantero., J.J., Liira, J., Cisneros, J.M.., Gonzalez, J., Petryna, L. and Zobel Nunez, M., 2003. Species richness, alien species and plant traits in central Argentine mountain grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, pp. 129-136.
    • Cassel, D.K. and Nielsen, D.R., 1986. Field capacity and available water capacity. In: Klute, A. (Ed.),  Methods of Soil Analysis part 1. Soil Physical Properties. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 901-924.
    • Corenblit, D., Baas, A.C.W., Bornette, G., Darrozes, J., Delmotte, S., Francis, R.A., Gurnell, A.M., Julien, F., Naiman, R.J. and Steiger, J., 2011. Feedbacks between geomorphology and biota controlling Earth surface processes and landforms: A review of foundation concepts and current understandings, Earth-Science Reviews, 106, pp. 307–331.
    • Heywood, V.H., Davis, S.D. (1994). Introduction. In: Davis, S.D., Heywood, V.H., Hamilton, A.C. (Eds.), Centres of Plant Diversity: A Guide and Strategy for Their Conservation. Vol. Europe, Africa, South West Asia and the Middle East. WWF/ IUCN. IUCN Publications Unit, Cambridge, pp. 1e38.
    • D'Odorico, P., Caylor, K., Okin, G.S. and Scanlon, T.M., 2007. On soil moisture - vegetation feedbacks and their possible effects on the dynamics of dryland ecosystems, Journal of Geophysical Research, 112 p.
    • Ebrahimi, M., Masoodipour, A.R. and Rigi, M., 2015. Role of Soil and Topographic Features in Distribution of Plant Species (Case study: Sanib Taftan Watershed), Ecopersia Journal, 3 (1), pp. 917- 932.
    • Field, J.J., 1994. Surficial processes, channel change, and geological methods of flood- hazard assessment on fluvially dominated alluvial fans in Arizona. (Ph.D thesis), University of Arizona, 258 p.
    • Frey W, Probst P., 1986. A synopsis of the vegetation of Iran In: Kiirschner H. (Ed) Contributions to the Vegetation of Southwest Asia. Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 9-43.
    • Haghiyan, A., Ghorbani, J., Shokri, M. and Jafariyan, Z., 2008. Separating of the effect of soil factors with the effect of topography factors on vegetation distribution in summer rangeland in Central Alborz. Rangeland Journal, 3(1), pp. 53-68.
    • Hedge, I.C. and Wendelbo, P., 1978. Patterns of distribution and endemism in Iran. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh, 36(2), pp.441-464.
    • Jafari, M., Javadi, A., Bagherpor Zarchi, M.A. and Tahmores, M., 2009. The relationships between soil characteristics and vegetation in Yazd province rangelands, Journal of Rangeland, 3, pp. 29-40.
    • Jensen, M.E., 1990. Interpretation of environmental gradients which influence sagebrush community distribution in northeast Nevada, J. Range Management, 43(2), pp. 161-167.
    • Khan, M. and Hussian, F., 2013. classification and ordination of vegetation in Tehsil Takht-e- Nasrati, District karak, Kyber Pakhtunkhawa, Pakistan, Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment, 5 (3), pp. 30- 39.
    • Kharkwal, G., Mehrotra, P., Rawat, Y. and Pangtey, Y., 2005. Phytodiversity and growth form in relation toaltitudinal gradient in the Central Himalayan (Kumaun) region of India. Current Science, 89, pp. 873-878.
    • Kier, G., Mutke, J., Dinerstein, E., Ricketts, T. H., Küper, W., Kreft, H., 2005. Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge, Journal of biogeography, Volume 32, Issue7, pp. 1107-1116.
    • Knudsen, D., Peterson, G. A. and Pratt, P. F., 1982. Lithium, Sodium and potassium. In: Page, A.L.,Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R. (Eds), Methods of SoilAnalysis, Part 2- Chemical and MicrobiologicalProperties (second edition). Madison, Wisconsin. American Society of Agronomy, pp. 225-246.
    • Kroetsch, D. 2008. Particle size distribution: Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: 713- 725.
    • Leonard, J.J. and Durrant-Whyte, H.F. 1991. Simultaneous map building and localization for an autonomous mobile robot. In Proceedings IROS'91: IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems', 91, pp. 1442-1447.
    • Leps, J. and Smilauer, P., 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using Canoco. Cambridge University Press, UK. 369p.
    • Ludwig j. A. and Reynolds j., F. 1988. Statisticcal ecology a primer on methods and computing, A wiley Interscience publication, a primer in methods and computing, Vol. 1, 337 p.
    • Lyon, J. and Gross, N. M., 2005. Patterns of plant diversity and plant– environmental relationships across three riparian corridors. Forest Ecology and Managament 204, pp. 267-278.
    • Mehrabian, A. R. & Sayadi, S., 2016. Diversity and distribution patterns of Solanaceae in Iran: Implications for conservation and habitat management with emphasis on endemism and diversity in SW Asia, Rostaniha, 17(2), pp. 136–160.
    • Mehrabian, A. R. 2015. Distribution patterns and diversity of Onosma in Iran: with emphasis on endemism conservation and distribution pattern in SW Asia, Rostaniha 16(1): 36- 60.
    • Mehrabian, A. R. and Sayadi, S., 2017. Distribution patterns of Convolvulaceae in Iran: priorities for conservation, Rostaniha 18(2), pp. 181–197.
    • Mclean, E.O., 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement.In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R. (Eds),Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2- Chemical andMicrobiological Properties (second edition).Madison, Wisconsin. American Society ofAgronomy, pp. 199-224.
    • MacNab, W.P., Browning, S.A., Simon, S.S. and Fouts, P., 1999. An unconventional approach to ecosystem unit classification in western North Carolina. USA Forest Ecology and Management, 11, pp. 405-420.
    • Macune, B. and Grace, G., 2002. Analysis of ecological communities, MjM software design.
    • Mahmoudi, A. A., Zahedi, Gh. and Etemad, E., 2012. The investigation on the relationship between soil physical and chemical properties and succulence of natural and planted saxaul (Haloxylon spp) (Case study: Hosseinabad plain, Southern Khorasan province). Iranian Journal of Forest, 4 (4), pp. 289-299.
    • Minggagud, H. and Yang, J., 2013. Wetland plant species diversity in sandy land of a semi-arid inland region of China, PlantBio systems, 1(147), pp. 25-32.
    • Moghaddam, M. R., 2005. Quantitative PlantEcology. University of Tehran, 701 p.
    • Mohtashamnia S., Zahedi, G and Arzani, H., 2008. Vegetation Ordination of Steppic Rangelands in Relation to the Edaphical and Physiographical factors(Case Study: Abadeh Rangelands, Fars).RangelandJournal, Vol.1, No. 2, pp. 158-142.
    • Muller- Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H., 2003. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. The Blackburn Press, New Jersey. 547p.
    • Nelson, R.E., 1982. Carbonate and gypsum. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Wisconsin, pp. 181–197.
    • Nicole, P., 2012. Effects of Land Surface Characteristics on Pedogenesis, Biological Soil Crust Community Diversity, and Ecosystem Functions in a Mojave Desert Piedmont Landscape, PhD thesis in Soil and Water Sciences, University of California.
    • Nosrati, K., 2013. Assessing soil quality indicator underdifferent land use and soil erosion usingmultivariate statistical techniques. Environmental Monitoring andAssessment, 185, pp.2895- 2907.
    • Noroozi, J., Akhani, H. and Breckle, S.W., 2008. Biodiversity and phytogeography of the alpine flora of Iran. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(3), pp. 493-521.
    • Pinto, J. R. R., Oliveira-Filho, A. T. and Hay, J. D. V., 2006. Influence of soil and topography on the composition of a tree community in a Central Brazilian valley forest. Edinburg Journal of Botany, 62, pp. 69-90.
    • podani, J., 1989. comparisom of ordination and classification of vegetation data, vegetation, 83 (1- 2), pp. 11- 128.
    • Rostampour, M., 2008. Investigation of vegetation- environment relationships in Zirkouh rangelands of Qaen. MSc. Thesis, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran.
    • Ruokolainen, L. and Salo, K., 2006. differences in performance of four ordination on a complex vegetation dataset. Annales Botanici Fennici, 43 (4), pp. 269- 275.
    • Schoenau, j.j. and O’Halloran, I. P., 2008. Sodium Bicarbonate-Extractable Phosphorus: Carter, M.R., Gregorich E.G. (Eds.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp. 115- 121.
    • Shumar, L. & Anderson, E., 1986. Gradient analysis of vegetation dominated by two subspecies of big sagebrush, Journal of Range Mangment, 39(2), pp. 156-160.
    • Takhtajan, A., 1986. Floristic regions of the world. Berkeley, etc.:(Transl. by TJ Crovello.) Univ.  Calif. Press, 581, p.1.
    • Thomas, G.W., 1996. Soil pH and Soil Acidity. In: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part3 – Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society ofAmerica, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 475-490.
    • Townend, J. and Reeve, M.J., 2001. Water release characteristic. In: Smith, K.A., Mullins, C.E. (Eds.), Soil and Environmental Analysis: Physical Analysis. CRC Press, New York, pp. 95-140.
    • Tryon, R.C. 1939. Cluster analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Walkley, A and Black, I.A., 1834. An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and A Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method: SOIL SCIENCE, v, 37, pp. 28-34.
    • Xiangping, Z., Mengben, W., Bo. Sh. and Yang, X., 2006. Quantitative classification and ordination of forest communities in Pangquangou National Nature reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26 (2), pp. 754- 761.
    • Zhang, X., Mengben, W., Bo S. and Yang, X., 2006. Quantitative classification and ordination of forest communities in Pangquangou National Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(3), pp. 754−761.
    • Zohary, M., 1973. Geobotanical Foundations of the Middle East. Vol. 1-2, Gustav Fischer Verlag Press, Stuttgart, Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.