بررسی حساسیت ژئومورفیک رودخانه طالقان با تاکید بر نقش پوشش گیاهان حاشیه‌ای .

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری مخاطرات ژئومورفولوژی دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران.

2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران.

3 استادیار گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران.

10.22034/gmpj.2023.384198.1414

چکیده

مطالعه حساسیت ژئومورفیک رودخانه، مبنایی برای توسعه یک رویکرد تحلیلی فراهم می‌کند که می‌تواند برای ارزیابی رفتار رودخانه در دوره­های مختلف مورد استفاده قرار گیرد. هدف این مطالعه بررسی حساسیت ژئومورفیک رودخانه طالقان طی دوره مطالعاتی 1400-1370 بوده است. بدین منظور، رودخانه مورد مطالعه بر اساس روش GUS به 5 بازه تقسیم شد. شاخص حساسیت رودخانه در هر بازه با استفاده از محاسبه شاخص­های نسبت انشعاب (BI)، عرض رودخانه (CW) و فعالیت مجرا (CA) در دوره 1385-1370 و 1400-1385 از طریق مقایسه عکس­های هوایی و تصاویر ماهواره­ای محاسبه شد. سپس، موقعیت کلنی­های پایدار پوشش گیاهی در حاشیه رودخانه در امتداد 71 مقطع عرضی طی دوره مطالعاتی بررسی شد. بر اساس نتایج، مساحت پوشش گیاهی پایدار طی دوره مورد مطالعه از بالادست رودخانه به سمت پایین دست کاهش یافته و ناپایداری بستر افزایش یافته است. به همین ترتیب، میزان تاثیر اختلالات انسانی و حساسیت بستر نیز از بالادست به سمت پایین دست افزایش یافته است. با توجه به کاهش عرض بستر در بازه­های 1 و 2 رودخانه طالقان و نیز افزایش مساحت پوشش گیاهی پایدار، می­توانیم تاثیر مثبت کلنی­های گیاهی ثابت را بر کاهش حساسیت ژئومورفیک این بازه­ها نسبت به سایر بازه­ها شاهد باشم.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Geomorphic Sensitivity of Taleghan River Emphasizing Riparian Vegetation

نویسندگان [English]

  • sahar Darabi Shahmari 1
  • ezatollah ghanavati 2
  • Ali Ahmadabadi 3
  • morovat eftekhari 3
1 geography faculty, kharazmi university
2 department of physical geography, geography faculty , kharazmi university
3 Department of physical geography, kharazmi university
چکیده [English]

Introduction

River sensitivity is affected by geomorphic forms and adjusting river ability (Fryzer, 20017). Taking into account the difference adjusting capability, the behavioral sensitivity of a river can be observed over the entire river. However, there is the major various change in a behavioral regime of a river, due to episodic turbulence or disturbances events (Philips, 2009). River behavior monitoring over time shows variable behavioral sensitivity, however, it can be dynamically evaluated, so that it causes more sensitivity in some rivers and flexibility in others. This study aimed to investigate the river sensitivity of the Taleghan River emphasizing the effect of riparian vegetation.



Methodology

The research tools were aril photographs and satellite images for the study period (table 1). Taleghan River was classified into 3 sections upstream, midstream, and downstream with average elevations of 1936, 1875, and 1793m, respectively, and a minimum slope of 0.009 to a maximum of 0.013. Channel stability was calculated by analysis of channel planform indices, including BI, CA, and CW. the sustainable patches with approximately sustainable area and location were determined using overlaying the aerial photographs and satellite images. The vegetation patches with an area of more than 500m were considered and the vegetation patches lower than 500m with a detachment of vegetation cover. The riparian vegetation degradation was observed using field observation over the study period.



Results & discussion

Based on the findings, the SI index was approximately similar for the entire river and it is in the high level of sensitivity; however, the SI index was increased over 1370-13855. So, the distribution of the change over 2006-2021 is lower than 1991-2006, although the change level in 2021 is more and the change distribution is lower. It means that the change processes in all reaches are approximately the same. The relationship between the CW and CA with the BI index was explained using an X-Y plot (figure 4). The findings showed a significant correlation between the BI and CA with CA. River geomorphic sensitivity and the change level decreased and increased, respectively in 2021 than the past period (table 4). 82 sustainable vegetation patches were detected on the left and right banks of the Taleghan River during the study period. The area of the vegetation patches was 19.51%, 32.92%, 31.70%, 13.41%, and 2.46% in sub-reaches 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The degraded patches were in the sub-reach 1 and most of them were located near the river banks because of the establishment of vegetation patches near the river banks (fluvial traces), river undercutting due to the high hydraulic tension, and decreased bed weight and erosion by water flow. In other sub reaches changes in the turbulence intensity profile caused the distance of maximum levels from river banks.



Conclusion

In this study, BI, CW, CA, and SI indices in the 1st sub-reach with sinusoidal-straight planform during the studied period are lower compared to other intervals, and the amount of sedimentation is higher compared to erosion. The geomorphic sensitivity has decreased significantly in 2021 compared to the previous period and the area of the sustainable patches with a length of 3603.18 meters was 27.89645 square meters. Therefore, the least changes in geomorphology were observed in sub-reach 1, while the area of the sustainable patches in this sub-reach is more compared to other sub-reaches. It was observed that the vegetation patches were established in the sub reach 1 and part of the sub reach 2 on the immediate side of the river, and it has played a significant role in reducing erosion, adhesion of soil particles, and preventing the separation of soil particles, and hence increasing cohesion against erosion. However, the level of vegetation degradation in sub-reach 1 is significant due to the increase of hydraulic stress gradient compared to other sub-reaches. The ascending order of geomorphic sensitivity was observed in sub-reaches 1, 5, 4, 2, and 3, respectively in 2021. Whereas, the ascending order of geomorphic sensitivity was observed in sub-reaches 4, 1, 2, 5, and 3, respectively in 2006. Meanwhile, sub-reach 1 had a balanced trend and on the other hand, geomorphic sensitivity in sub-reach 3 was more than in other sub-reaches in the studied period (Table 4). Our observations have shown that in the vegetation patches, a combination of woody vegetation can be introduced as ecosystem engineers; because they have caused the increase of sedimentation and the creation of sedimentary tails, and the formation of landforms. The engineering effect of vegetation typologies along the Taleghan River has mainly occurred in places with a suitable physical location for sedimentation related to flow characteristics. River engineer species can develop different response characteristics to hydrogeomorphic constraints, therefore making possible their establishment in an unsustainable and disturbed geomorphic environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ecogeomorphology
  • Raparian Vegetation
  • Taleghan River
  • Geomorphic sensitivity
دارابی شاهماری، سحر.، قنواتی، عزت اله.، توماس، مارتین.، احمدآبادی، علی.، افتخاری، مروت.، 1399، تحلیل زیستگاه­ های حاشیه­ای رودخانه طالقان بر اساس واحدهای ژئومورفیک رودخانه­ای، پژوهش­های ژئومورفولوژی کمی، دوره 9، شماره 2، 80-60 . http://www.geomorphologyjournal.ir/article_118225.html
Wohl, E., Brierley, G. J., Cadol, D., Coulthard, T. J., Covino, T., Fryirs, K. A., et al. (2019). Connectivity as an emergent property of geomorphic systems. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44, 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4434
Fryirs, K. (2013). (Dis)Connectivity in catchment sediment cascades: A fresh look at the sediment delivery problem. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38, 30–46.
https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3242

Tooth, S., (2018), The geomorphology of wetlands in drylands: Resilience, nonresilience, or …?. Geomorphology, 305:33-48.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169555X17301319

Fryirs, KA., (2017), River sensitivity: A lost foundation concept in fluvial geomorphology. Earth surface & Processes landforms, 42(1):55-70

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/esp.3940

Brierley, G., Fryirs, KA., (2005). Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework, 1st edition. Wiley-Blackwell; Newyork

Fryirs, K., (2015), Developing and using geomorphic condition assessments for river rehabilitation planning, implementation and monitoring, WIREs Water. 2(6):649– 667. 
Phillips, JD., (2009), Changes, perturbations and responses in geomorphic systems. Progress in Physical Geography. 33(1):17-30.
Phillips, JD., (2014), State transitions in geomorphic responses to environmental change, Geomorphology, 204: 208-216.
 
Schumm, SA., (1969), River metamorphosis. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 95: 255–274.
https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0001938

Khan, S., Fryirs, K., (2020), An approach for assessing geomorphic river sensitivity across a based on analysis of historical capacity for adjustment, Geomorphology, 359:107135

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169555X20301070

Lisenby, PE., Croke, J., Fryirs, KA., (2018), Geomorphic effectiveness: a linear concept in a non-linear world, Earth surface Processes & Landforms,43(1):4-20

Finnegan, NJ., Roe, G., Mongomery, DR., Hallet, B.,( 2005), Controls on the channel width of rivers: Implications for modeling fluvial incision of bedrock, Geology, 33(3):229-232

Allen, GH., David, CH., Andreadis, KM., Hossain, F., Famiglietti, SJ., (2015), Global Estimates of River Flow Wave Travel Times and Implications for Low-Latency Satellite Data, Geophysical Resaerch Letter, 45:7551-7560.

Nicholas, AP., Ashworth, PJ., Sambrook, GH., Sandbach, SD., (2013), Numerical simulation of bar and island morphodynamics in anabranching megarivers, JGR Earth Surface, 118(4):2019-2044

Pavelsky, TM., Allen, GH., Miller, ZF., (2015), Spatial patterns of river width in the Yukon river basin, 8 seasson of Remote Sensing of the Terrestrial Water Cycle, Geophysical Monograph 206, First Edition, Edited by Venkat Lakshmi. American Geophysical Union, Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Casado, A., Peiry, J.L., Campo, A.M., (2016), Geomorphic and vegetation changes in a meandering dryland river regulated by a large dam, Sauce Grande River, Argentina, Geomorphology, 268: 21-34.
Kuo, C., Chen, CF., Chen, SC., Yang, TC., Chen, CW., (2017), Channel Planform Dynamics Monitoring and Channel Stability Assessment in Two Sediment-Rich Rivers in Taiwan, Water, 9(84)
EL-ASMAR, HM., HEREHER, ME., EL-KAFRAWY, SB., (2013), Surface area change detection of the Burullus Lagoon, North of the Nile Delta, Egypt, using water indices: A remote sensing approach. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 16(1):119.
Tockner, K., Paetzold, A., Karaus, U., Clart, C, Zettel, J., (2006), Ecology of braided rivers. In bbok: Braided Rivers: Process, Deposits, Ecology and Management, Wiley-Blackwell: Newyork
Leopold, LB., Wolman, MG., (1957), River channel patterns: Braided, meandering and straight, United States, Geological Survey Professional Paper, 282-B:35–85.
Schumm, SA., Khan, HR., (1972), Experimental study of channel patterns, Bull. of Geological Society of America, 83:1755–1770.
Henderson, FM., (1961), Stability of alluvial channels. Journal of Hydraulic Division, American Society for Civil Engineering, 87:109–138.
Parker, G., (1976), On the cause and characteristics scale of meandering and braided in rivers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 76:459–80.
 
Sharma, N., (2004), Mathematical modelling and braid indicators, In the Brahmaputra river basin water resources, V.P.Singh (Ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 47:229–260.
Akhtar, M., Sharma, N., Ojha, C., (2011), Braiding process and bank erosion in the Brahmaputra River. International Journal of Sediment Research. 26(40):431–444.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1001627912600031

Reid, HE., Brierly, GJ., (2015), Assessing geomorphic sensitivity in relation to river capacity for adjustment. Geomorphology, 251:108-121

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169555X15301458

Wellmeyer, J., Slattery, MC., Philips, J., (2005), Quantifying downstream impacts of impoundment on flow regime and channel planform, lower Trinity River, Texas. Geomorphology. 69(1-4);1-13.

Esfandiary, F., Rahimi, M., (2019), Analysis of river lateral channel movement using quantitative geomorphometric indicators, Qara-Sou River, Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 78: 469.
Chatzinikolaou, Y., Ntemiri, K., Zogaris, S., (2011), River riparian zone assessment using a rapid site-based index in greece. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 20(2);296-302
Zogaris, S., Economou, AN., (2017), The Biogeographic Characteristics of the River Basins of Greece. In: Skoulikidis, N., Dimitriou, E., Karaouzas, I. (eds) The Rivers of Greece. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 59. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_475