ارزیابی آسیب‌پذیری آبخوان دشت بیلوردی بر مبنای ترکیب روش‌های DRASTIC و SINTACS

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه ارومیه

2 دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

آب‌های زیرزمینی اصلی‌ترین منبع آب شیرین در دشت بیلوردی است. افزایش جمعیت و کشاورزی باعث شده آب زیرزمینی در این آبخوان در معرض خطر کمی و کیفی قرار گیرد، لذا بررسی آسیب‌پذیری و به تبع آن جلوگیری از آلودگی آب‌های زیرزمینی مهم و ضروری به نظر می رسد. افت شدید سطح آب در منطقه باعث کاهش کیفیت آب زیرزمینی شده و در چند سال اخیر این دشت جزء دشت‌های ممنوعه محسوب شده است. مسئله مهم دیگر، وجود معدن آرسنیک ولیلو در محدوده دشت است که خطر آلودگی آب‌های زیرزمینی را افزایش می‌دهد. در این پژوهش از ترکیب روش‌های  DRASTIC و SINTACS  برای پیش‌بینی آسیب‌پذیری آبخوان استفاده شده است. برای صحت‌سنجی نتایج ازداده‌های نیترات و ضریب همبستگی آن با شاخص آسیب‌پذیری در منطقه استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد با وجود این‌که که روش SINTACS با ضریب همبستگی بالا نسبت به روش DRASTIC کارایی نسبی بهتری دارد ولی با توجه به تشابه و تقارب نتایج انتخاب یکی از آن‌ها به عنوان روش برتر برای ارزیابی آسیب‌پذیری محدوده مورد مطالعه کار منطقی به نظر نمی‌رسد. لذا در این تحقیق روش‌های DRASTIC و SINTACS  برای ارزیابی آسیب‌پذیری آبخوان دشت بیلوردی ترکیب شد تا از مزیت هر دو روش به طور همزمان استفاده شود. نتایج حاصل ازروش پیشنهادی  5/36 درصد مساحت منطقه در مرکز را جزو مناطق با آسیب‌پذیری کم و20 درصد از قسمت جنوب غربی و شمال‌شرق جزء مناطق با آسیب‌پذیری زیاد و 5/43 درصد  مساحت در محدوده آسیب‌پذیری متوسط قرار دارد. ارائه راهکار مناسب و باصرفه برای جلوگیری از افزایش آلودگی دشت از جمله تعیین مناطق آسیب‌پذیر، از اقدامات مهم و ضروری در محدوده مطالعاتی است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Bilverdi plain aquifer vulnerability based on combination of DRASTIC and SINTACS methods

چکیده [English]

Groundwater is the main source of fresh water in Bilverdi plain aquifer. The groundwater level declination in this aquifer has increased salinity and recently, more withdrawals have been forbidden. This aquifer exposes to high pollution risk due to presence of Vallilu arsenic mine. In this study the DRASTIC and SINTACS methods combined to assess Bilverdi aquifer vulnerability, The correlation coefficient between nitrate concentration in groundwater and vulnerability index  results showed that although SINTACS method have relatively better performance due to high correlation coefficient rather than drastic method, but selection of one methods as a best model do not seem reasonable due to similarity of the performances. Therefore, this study reaps advantages of both DRASTIC and SINTACS methods to evaluate vulnerability of Bilverdi plain aquifer. Based on this proposed method 36% of the area in plain center is located in low vulnerability area, 20% in the northeastern and southwest regions have high vulnerability and 43% of the area covered medium vulnerability. 
Introduction
Groundwater pollution due to increasing population, industrial and agricultural development need treatment which is costly and problematic. Therefore, The best and most important action is to identify vulnerable areas. Infiltration and release of pollutants from ground surface to groundwater can be defined as the concept of vulnerability. Bilverdi plain is one of the most active agricultural, livestock and industry sectors in which agricultural fertilizers are used. In addition, occurrence of Valilu arsenic mine and the probability of the impact of mine drainage on groundwater resources show the necessity of the aquifer vulnerability assessment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the vulnerability of Bilverdi plain aquifer to determine areas with high potential of groundwater contamination using DRASTIC and SINTACS methods. combination method was suggested to reap the advantages of both methods to assess the vulnerability of this aquifer.
Methodology
The Bilverdi sub-basin, 289 km2 in area, is located approx. 65 km of Tabriz city, Eest Azerbaijan, Iran. In this study, Bilverdi plain vulnerability was considered with a new combination approach. DRASTIC method is a quantitative model that is designed to estimate the potential of groundwater system pollution in a regional scale based on seven hydrological parameters including groundwater depth (D), recharge (R), aquifer media (A), soil (S), topography (T), impact of unsaturated zone (I) and the hydraulic conductivity (C). These layers are overlaid by weighting based on Aller et al. (1987) to generate vulnerability map.
The type and the number of parameters of the SINTACS method is also the same as to the DRASTIC method, but the rating and weighting of the parameters are different. Both methods have high predictive capability despite the similar correlation index. Choosing each of the methods as a superior method increases the uncertainty in the results. Therefore, in this study, for the simultaneous used efficiency of the both model, the combined model was presented to obtain accurate results.
 
Results and Discussion 
The vulnerability maps were obtained by overlaying seven parameters of SINTACS and DRASTIC methods in the Arc GIS environment. The DRASTIC index for Bilverdi plain is numerically between 53 and 160. According to Aller classification, three groups of vulnerability including low (53-97), medium (98-141) and high (160-414) corresponded to 13%, 82% and 5% of the area, respectively The SINTACS index is numerically between 70 and 169, which is divided into three groups: low (116-70), medium (117-164) and high (169-164) vulnerability and they are corresponded to 30%, 67% and 3% of the area, respectively.
Correlation index (CI) of both methods show the similarity of them. Therefore, normalized vulnerability index of both methods are weighted by their CI values to generate combination method. The vulnerability index of combination method was obtained from 0. 00005 to 0. 96, which was classified into three groups: low vulnerability (0.52-0.00005), medium (0.69-0.50) and high (0.96-0.96) which was corresponded to 36.5%, 43.5% and 20% of the area, respectively.
 
Conclusion
In this study, SINTACS and DRASTIC methods developed to assess groundwater vulnerability maps. According to results similarity of these methods, combination method adopted to reap the advantages of both methods. Presented method was indicated better results. In the Northeast and Southwest region of the Bilverdi plain, high vulnerability area located in the low groundwater depths areas and in the central areas of the plain, the vulnerability is low due to the presence of fine silt and clay grains. Advantages of both methods are adopted by combination method to cover disadvantages of each method to assess groundwater vulnerability in the Bilverdi plain aquifer.
 

 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bilverdi Plain
  • DRASTIC
  • DSM
  • SINTACS
  • vulnerability
  • اصغری‌مقدم، اصغر؛ قره‌خانی، مریم؛ ندیری، عطاالله؛ کرد، مهدی؛ فیجانی، الهام، 1396، ارزیابی آسیب‌پذیری آبخوان دشت اردبیل با استفاده از روش‌های DRASTIC ،SINTACS و SI . نشریه علمی پژوهشی جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، سال بیست و یکم، شماره 61، صص 74- 57.
  • جوانشیر، گلنار؛ ندیری، عطاالله؛ صادق‌فام، سینا؛ عباس نوین‌پور، اسفندیار، 1395، ارائه روش جدید به منظور ارزیابی آسیب‌پذیری ابخوان دشت مغان بر مبنای ترکیب روش های دراستیک، سینتکس و اس‌آی، مجله اکوهیدرولوژی، سال سوم، شماره 4، صص 503- 491. 
  • موسوی، سیده فاطمه؛ یعقوبی، سید مسعود؛ چیت‌سازان، منوچهر، 1395، ارزیابی آسیب‌پذیری آبخوان خویس با به کارگیری مدل دراستیک وسینتکس به منطور مدیریت کاربری اراضی. مجله آب و فاضلاب، سال بیست و هفتم، شماره 3، صص 75- 79 .
  • Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J.H., Petty,R.J., Hackett, G., 1987. DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings.U.S,Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Oklahoma. , EPA 600/2-87-035.
  • Al-Zabet, T., 2002.Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC Methods. Environmental Geology. 43,pp. 203-208.
  • Antonakos, A.K., Lambrakis, N.J., 2007. Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the drastic model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece. Journal of Hydrology, 333,pp. 288–304.
  • Boughriba. M., Barkaoui. A., Zarhloule. Y., Lahmer. Z., El-Houadi. B., Verdoya. M., 2009. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping of the Angad transboundary aquifer using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment, Arabian Journal of Geoscience. 3, pp. 207-220.
  • Chilton,P.J., A.,Vlugman, S., Foster ., 1990. A groundwater pollution risk assessment for public water supply sources in Barbados, American Water Resources Association International Conference on Tropical Hydrology and Caribbean Water resources, San Juan de Puerto Rico, pp. 279-289.
  • Civita, Massimo., 1990. Legenda unificata per le Carte della vulnerabilita dei corpi idrici sotterranei/ Unified legend for the aquifer pollution vulnerability Maps, Studi sulla Vulnerability degli Acquiferi, Pitagora Edit, Bologna.
  • Corniello, A., Ducci, D and Napolitano, P., 1997. Comparison between parametric methods to evaluate aquifer pollution vulnerability using a GIS: An example in the Piana Campana., In: Engineering Geology and the Environment, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp 1721-1726. 
  • Fijani, E., Nadiri, A., Asghari Moghaddam, A., Tsai , F. T-C and Dixon, B., 2013. Optimization of DRASTIC Method by Supervised Committee Machine Artificial Intelligence to Assess Groundwater Vulnerability for MaraghehBonab Plain Aquifer, Iran, Journal of hydrology, 530,  pp 89-100.
  • Hamza, M. H and  Added, A.,  Frances, A and Rodrıguez, R., 2007. Validitede lapplication des me´thodes de vulnerabilite DRASTIC, SINTACS et SI a letude de la pollution par les nitrates dans la nappe phre´atique de Metline Ras Jebel–Raf Raf, Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 339, pp 493-505.
  • Kaddour. k., houcine. b,.Smail. M., 2014. Assessment of the vulnerability of an aquifer by DRASTIC and SYNTACS methods: Aquifer of Bazer – Geult Zerga area (northeast Algeria), Journal of Environmental Research and Management Vol. 5(9). pp. 0169-0179.
  • Kim, Y. J., Hamm, s.y., 1999. Assement of the potentinal for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC /EGIS technique,Cheongju area, South Korea, Hydrogeology Journal. Volum 7,  pp 227-235
  • Nadiri. AA., Garekhani. M,. Khatibi. R,. Moghadam. AA., 2017,b. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using supervised committee to combine fuzzy logic models, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(9), pp. 8562- 8577.
  • Nadiri. AA., Garekhani. M,. Khatibi. R,. Sadeghfam. S,. Asghari Moghaddam. A., 2017,a. Groundwater vulnerability indices conditioned by Supervised Intelligence Committee Machine (SICM), Science of the Total Environment, 574 , pp. 691–706.
  • Nadiri. AA., Sedghi. Z.,  Khatibi. R., Garekhani. M, 2017,c. Mapping vulnerability of multiple aquifers using multiple models and fuzzy logic to objectively derive model structures, Science of the Total Environment, 593–594 (2017) 75–90.
  • Rahman. A., 2008. A GIS Based DRASTIC model for Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability in Shallow Aquifer in Aligarh, India. Applied Geography, 28 32-53.
  • Sadeghfam, S., Hasanzadeh,Y., Nadiri,A.A., 2016. Mapping groundwater potential field using catastrophe fuzzy membership functions and Jenks optimization method: a case study of Maragheh-Bonab plain,Iran. Envirmental Earth Sciences,75:545.
  • Stigter, T.Y., Ribeiro, L and Carvalho Dill, A. M. M., 2006 . Evaluation of an intrinsic and a specific vulnerability assessment method in comparison with groundwater salinisation and nitrate contamination level in two agriculture regions in the south of Portugal, Hydrogeol J, Vol 14, pp 79-99.
  • Van Stempvoort,D., L.,Ewert, L.,Wassenaar., 1993. Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS-compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping, Canadian Water Resources Journal,  1,pp.  25-37. 
  • Voudouris. K., Nazakis. N., Polemio. M., Kareklas. K., 2010. Assessment of intrinsic vulnerability using the DRASTIC model and GIS in the Kiti aquifer, Cyprus, European Water, 30,pp. 13-24.
  • Vrba, J., Zoporozec, A., 1994. Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability,IAH International contribution for Hydrogeology, Hannover7 Heise, 16: PP. 131.
  • Zhou, J.G., Li, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Guo, X., 2010. DRAV model and its application in assessing groundwater vulnerability in arid area: a case study of pore phreatic water in Tarim Basin, Xinjiang, Northwest China,  Environmental Earth Science, 60(5),pp. 1055-1063.
  • Baghapour, M.A. Fadaei Nobandegani, A. Talebbeydokhti, N. Bagherzadeh, S. Nadiri, A.A. Gharekhani, M. Chitsazan, N., 2016. Optimization of DRASTIC method by artificial neural network, nitrate vulnerability index, and composite DRASTIC models to assess groundwater vulnerability for unconfined aquifer of Shiraz Plain, Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 14 (13)