The effect of land use changes on the potential for landslide risk in Meshkinshahr County.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
10.22034/gmpj.2025.508815.1548
Abstract
Introduction

Landslides are one of the most destructive geomorphological hazard processes of the range, which not only cause huge losses to human society and economic development but also pose a serious threat to the environment. In recent years, successive changes in land use, due to the necessity of meeting the various needs of the growing world population, represent an important part of global changes in the environment, and often unprincipled changes in land use as a dynamic factor related to human activities, also lead to an increase in the potential for landslides. Meshkinshahr County (located in Ardabil Province), due to environmental characteristics including; topographic conditions, loose and unstable surface materials on resistant formations, and climatic conditions, has a high potential for landslide hazards. However, in recent years, due to the growing population and unprincipled land use changes, the potential for this hazard to occur at the county level has increased. Accordingly, the present study seeks to evaluate the effect of land use changes on the potential for landslide hazard in this county.



Methodology

In this study, to investigate land use changes, first, Landsat satellite images from OLI-TM sensors for the years 2002 and 2024 were obtained from the US Geological Survey. Then, to prepare the images, geometric and atmospheric corrections were made on the images using Envi5.3 software. In the next stage, using the object-oriented classification method and the nearest neighbor algorithm using Ecognition software, land use maps were extracted in the two years under study. In the next stage, by identifying the effective factors involved in landslides in the region (including; Dem, slope, aspect, lithology, distance from fault, land use, precipitation, distance from communication road, and distance from river) and preparing information layers for each criterion in GIS, the evaluation and standardization of the layers were performed using the fuzzy membership function and weighting of the criteria, using the critic method. Finally; Final analysis and modeling were performed using the weighted linear combination multi-criteria analysis method.



Results and Discussion

Based on the results of the analysis of land use changes, in both years of study, poor pastures and dryland agriculture cover the largest area of the county. In contrast, irrigated areas and snow-covered lands have occupied the smallest amount of the total area of the county in both years 2000 and 2024. According to the results of the study, during the years of study; irrigated agriculture, dryland agriculture, residential areas, and irrigated areas have increased, and on the contrary, the area of gardens and forests, good pastures and poor pastures and snow-covered lands has decreased. In addition; considering the analysis of the method of land use conversion, it is observed that the largest land use change in the county was the conversion of poor pastures to dryland agriculture, and in 2024, compared to 2002, about 452.02 square kilometers of the area of poor pastures in the county was converted to dryland agriculture.

According to the results, in 2002, the slope, land use, and lithology criteria had the highest weight coefficient, respectively, and in 2024, the land use, slope, and lithology criteria had the highest weight coefficient. According to the landslide hazard zoning map, in 2002, the area of the very high-risk and high-risk categories was 457.606 and 994.776 square kilometers, which increased to 483.444 and 1103.104 square kilometers, respectively, in 2024. In terms of land use, in the landslide map in both 2000 and 2024, the areas with the very high-risk and high-risk categories were mainly located in agricultural uses (especially rainfed agriculture), pastures, and residential areas.



Conclusion

Considering the landslide zoning map in 2002 and 2024 and the large area of very high-risk and high-risk zones, it can be concluded that, in general, given the environmental conditions prevailing in the area, including the dominance of slopes with medium to steep slopes (15 to 80), altitudes of 1000 to 4000 meters, susceptible geological formations, rainfall and abundance of the waterway network and the under scouring of the slope support by flowing waters, fault structures and slope directions, trenching and removal of the slopes' toes following road construction and development activities, Meshkinshahr County has a high potential for the formation of landslide movements. However, with the changes in land use that have occurred in the county, such as an increase in the area of agricultural lands and residential areas, and a decrease in the area of pastures, gardens, and forest cover, the area of very high-risk and high-risk categories has increased by 25.835 and 158.328 square kilometers, respectively, in 2024 compared to 2000. Given the large area of landslide-prone areas in Meshkinshahr County and how land is being converted and changed, expert protection, watershed management, and management measures must be taken. Finally, it can be acknowledged that the results of this research have a practical aspect and it is expected that the use of the land use change map and landslide hazard zoning map obtained in the present study will be made available to stakeholders and organizations related to environmental hazard issues as a more powerful tool for understanding the effects of land use change on landslides and risk management and reducing losses and losses caused by the environmental hazard of landslides.
Keywords

اسفندیاری درآباد، فریبا؛ رستمی، قباد؛ مصطفی‌زاده، رئوف و عابدینی، موسی (1403). ارزیابی خطر وقوع زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از تئوری کاتاستروف در حوضه آبریز زمکان کرمانشاه. پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 13(2)، 106-125. https://doi.org/10.22034/gmpj.2024.452001.1498
اصغری سراسکانرود، صیاد و پیروزی، الناز  (1403). شناسایی و پهنه‌بندی مناطق مستعد وقوع خطر زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از روش تحلیل چندمعیارۀ آراس (منطقۀ مورد مطالعه: حوضۀ آبخیز قرنقوچای در جنوب‌شرق استان آذربایجان شرقی). جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی محیطی، 35 (3)، 65-94. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2024.140985.1639
اصغری‌سراسکانرود، صیاد و پیروزی، الناز (1401). ارزیابی مقایسه‌‏ای الگوریتم‌‏های تصمیم‌‏گیری چندمعیارهWLC ، OWA،VIKOR  و MABAC  در پهنه‌‏بندی خطر زمین‌‏لغزش مطالعۀ موردی: حوضه گیوی‌‏چای استان اردبیل. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی، 54 (1)، 94-65. https://doi.org/10.22059/JPHGR.2022.333658.1007656
اصغری سراسکانرود، صیاد و ناصری، احمد (1399). استخراج نقشه کاربری اراضی شهرستان سوسنگرد با استفاده از الگوریتم‌های پیکسل پایه و شی‌گرا. فضای جغرافیایی، 20 (69)، ۷۷-95. http://geographical-space.iau-ahar.ac.ir/article-1-3181-fa.html
حسین‌آبادی، سعید؛ اکبری، ابراهیم، و نقدبیشی، افسانه (1399). ارزیابی و شبیه‌سازی تغییرات کاربری اراضی با استفاده از طبقه‌بندی شی گرا و مدل زنجیره مارکوف (مورد مطالعه: شهر بیرجند و پیرامون آن). جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 9 (1)، 169-188. https://doi.org/10.22067/geo.v0i0.81819
ذاکری‌نژاد، رضا و کهرانی، عباس (1402). ارزیابی و مقایسه مدل‌های CART و TreeNet جهت تهیه نقشه‌های حساسیت زمین‌لغزش با استفاده نرم‌افزار SPM و سامانه اطلاعات جغرافیایی(GIS)، )مطالعه موردی حوضه آبخیز کمه، جنوب استان اصفهان). مخاطرات محیط طبیعی، 12 (37)، 38-17. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2023.42304.1904
رستمی‌زاد، قباد و دسترنج، علی (1403). ارزیابی حساسیت رخداد زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از الگوریتم ماشین‌بردار پشتیبان. مدل‌سازی و مدیریت آب و خاک، 4 (4)، 299-312. https://doi.org/10.22098/mmws.2023.13934.1379
زرگانی، زینب و علمیزاده، هیوا (1402). بررسی نقش تغیرات ارتفاعی و کاربری اراضی در خطر زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از روش فازی عصبی (مطالعه موردی: حوضه مسجد سلیمان). دومین همایش بین‌المللی و چهارمین همایش ملی توسعه پایدار دریا محور، خرمشهر، بهمن ماه 1402. https://civilica.com/doc/1972596/
زینالی، بتول؛ ملانوری، الهام و صفری، شیوا  (1402). بررسی تغییرات کاربری ارضی و مولفه‌های اقلیمی در شهرستان مشکین‌شهر، حفاظت آب و خاک، 12 (3)،  15-31. https://doi.org/10.30495/wsrcj.2022.68774.11316
ستوهیان، فرزاد (1394). بررسی نقش عوامل طبیعی و انسانی در بروز زمین‌لغزش‌های لاهیجان دراستان گیلان، اولین کنگره ملی توسعه و ترویج مهندسی کشاورزی و علوم خاک ایران، ۹ بهمن ۱۳۹۴، تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/972112
سیلاخوری، زهرا؛ وهابزاد کبریا، قربان و پورقاسمی، حمیدرضا (1402). تهیه نقشه حساسیت زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از مدل بیزین (مطالعه موردی: بخشی از حوضه آبخیز تالار، استان مازندران). پژوهشهای فرسایش محیطی، 13 (2)، 122-140. http://magazine.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-683-fa.html
عابدینی، موسی؛ پیروزی، الناز و شکر زاده، الهام (1400). ارزیابی و پهنه‌بندی خطر زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از الگوریتم تطبیقی MABAC و ANP  (مطالعه‌ی موردی: شهرستان نیر). پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 10 (2)، 136-155. https://doi.org/10.22034/gmpj.2021.215108.1214
عابدینی، موسی؛ قلعه، احسان؛ آقازاده، نازفر و محمدزاه شیشه‌گران، مریم (1401). پایش دمای سطح زمین و بررسی رابطه کاربری اراضی با دمای سطح با استفاده از تصاویر سنجنده OLI و TM. تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، 22 (67)، ۳۷۵-۳۹۳. https://doi.org/10.52547/jgs.22.67.375
عابدینی، موسی و موسوی، معصومه (1397). بررسی مهمترین مخاطرات محیطی در حوضه آبخیز شهر ایذه با استفاده از مدل‌های؛ WLC و TOPSIS، فضای جغرافیایی، 18 (61)، ۴۱-۶۲. http://geographical-space.iau-ahar.ac.ir/article-1-1873-fa.html
عبادی، الهام؛ اسفندیاری درآباد، فریبا؛ اصغری سراسکانرود، صیاد؛ مصطفی‌زاده، رئوف و ملانوری، الهام (1403). بررسی تغییرات کاریری اراضی با استفاده از تکنیک شی‌گرا و پیکسل پایه مطالعه موردی: حوضه فیروز آباد خلخال. جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، 28 (27)، 347-329. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2023.52092.3014
فیضی‌زاده، بختیار؛ خدمت‌زاده، علی و نیکجو، محمدرضا (1397). ریز طبقه‌بندی اراضی باغی و زراعی با استفاده از تکنیک‌های پردازش شی پایه والگوریتم‌های فازی با هدف تخمین سطح زیر کشت. تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، 18 (4)، 201-216.  https://doi.org/10.29252/jgs.18.48.201
کلارستاقی، عطاالله؛ حبیب‌نژاد، محمود و احمدی، حسن (1387). مطالعه وقوع زمین‌لغزش‌ها در ارتباط با تغییر کاربری اراضی و جاده‌سازی مطالعه موردی حوزه آبخیز تجن، ساری. پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی، 40 (1)، 81-91. https://www.ensani.ir/fa/article/47822/
لجم اورک، مرتضی و پیری، زهرا (1402). پهنه‌بندی خطر وقوع زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از مدل تحلیل سلسله مراتبی AHP و فن GIS  (مطالعۀ موردی: شهرستان باغملک). جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 12 (3)، 193-215. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2022.77009.1239
نگهبان، سعید، مرحمت، مهری و علی نژاد، حمید . (1404). ارزیابی و پهنه‌بندی حساسیت زمین لغزش با الگوریتم-های یادگیری ماشین (مطالعه موردی حوضه آبخیز مارگون، زاگرس فارس)پژوهشهای ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 14(2)، 42-61.
https://doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2025.474854.1519
نگهبان,سعید , پی سوزی,تینا , گنجائیان,حمید و نوروزی,میلاد . (1400). شناسایی مناطق مستعد وقوع زمین‌لغزش و جابجایی عمودی با استفاده از تصاویر راداری (مطالعه موردی: محدوده شهری و حاشیه شهری لواسان)جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 10(3) ، 1-18.   https://doi: 10.22067/geoeh.2021.71728.1094
Alcántara-Ayala, I. (2025). Landslides in a changing world. Landslides, Landslides, Published online, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02451-1
Arshad, MW., Mesran, M., Setiawansyah, S., Ryan Randy Suryono, RR., & Rahmanto, Y. (2023).  Combination of CRITIC Weighting Method and Multi-Atributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis in Staff Admissions. Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 2 (4), 77-86.  https://doi.org/10.47065/explorer. v4i2.1428
Badola, SH., Mishra, V.N., Parkash, S., & Pandey, M. (2023). Rule-based fuzzy inference system for landslide susceptibility mapping along national highway 7 in Garhwal Himalayas, India. Quaternary Science Advances, 11, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qsa.2023.100093
Bhattacharyya, R., & Mukherjee, S. (2021). Fuzzy Membership Function Evaluation by Non-LinearRegression: An Algorithmic Approach, Fuzzy infomation and engineering, 12 (4), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/16168658.2021.1911567
Bourenane, H., & Bouhadad, Y. (2021). Impact of Land Use Changes on Landslides Occurrence in Urban Area: The Case of the Constantine City (NE Algeria). Geotech Geol Eng, 39, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01768-1
Caleca, F., Scaini, C., Frodella, W., & Tofani, V. (2024). Regional-scale landslide risk assessment in Central Asia. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci, 24, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-13-2024
Chen, L., Guo, Z., Yin, K., Shrestha, D.P., & Jin, S. (2019). The influence of land use and land cover change on landslide susceptibility: a case study in Zhushan Town, Xuan'en County (Hubei, China). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 19 (10), 2207-2228. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2207-2019
Fauzi, R.A., Harini, R., & Rijanta, R. (2023). The Effect of Land Cover Changes On Landslides in Grindulu Watershed, Pacitan Regency, East Java. BIO Web of Conferences, 80, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20238003020
Ganjaeian, H., Rezaei Arefi, M., Peysoozi, T., & Emami, K. (2020). Zonning susceptible areas of landslide using WLC and OWA methods -A case study in Mountain cliff Khan, Iran. Sustainability Earth Review, 1(2), 43-51. 10.52547/sustainearth.1.2.43
Gao, C., Cheng, D., Iqbal, J., & Yao, S. (2023). Spatiotemporal Change Analysis and Prediction of the Great Yellow River Region (GYRR) Land Cover and the Relationship Analysis with Mountain Hazards. Land, 12(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020340
Kimura, T. (2024). Effects of Land Cover Changes and Rainfall Variation on the Landslide Size–Frequency Distribution in a Mountainous Region of Western Japan. Geosciences, 14(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14030059
Klimes, J., Novotny, j., Balek, j., Rosario, A.M., Torres, JC., Vargas, R., López, D., Obispo, Y., Roldán-Minaya, E., Caballero, A., Jara, H., Villafane, H., & Melgarejo, E. (2023). Landslide hazard assessment and risk reduction in the rural community of Rampac Grande, Cordillera Negra, Peru. Environ Earth Sci, 83 (27), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11307-1
Kumar, A., Sharma, R., & Bansal, V. (2022). Spatial Prediction of Landslide Hazard using GIS-multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Kullu District of Himachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Mining and Environment, 13(4), 943-956. https://jme.shahroodut.ac.ir/article_2535.html
Nanehkaran, Y. A., Chen, B., Cemiloglu, A., Chen, J., Anwar, S., Azarafza, M., & Derakhshani, R. (2023). Riverside Landslide Susceptibility Overview: Leveraging Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning in Accordance with the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals. Water, 15(15), 1-28. . https://doi.org/10.3390/w15152707
Ou, L., Huang, C. & Cao, Y. (2024). Research on landslide hazard assessment based on improved analytic hierarchy process optimizing multiple rainfall indicators. Discov Appl Sci, 6 (409), 1-16. . https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06119-2
Rabby, Y.W., Li, Y., Abedin, J., & Sabrina, S. (2022). Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Landslide Susceptibility in Rangamati Municipality of Rangamati District, Bangladesh. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11 (89). 1-16. of Geo-Information, 11 (89): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020089
Reichenbach, P., Busca, C., Mondini, A.C., & Rossi, M. (2014). The Influence of Land Use Change on Landslide Susceptibility Zonation: The Briga Catchment Test Site (Messina, Italy). Environ Manage, 54(6), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0357-0
Saha, A., Villuri, VGK., Bhardwaj, A., & Kumar, S.A. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Approach for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping of a Part of Darjeeling District in North-East Himalaya, India. Applied Science, 13(8), 5062, 1-23.  https://doi.org/10.3390/app13085062
Salehpour, Jam., Mosaffaie, A., & Sarfaraz, F. (2021). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models. Nat Hazards, 108, 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04718-5
Sim, K.B., Lee, M.L. & Wong, S.Y.A. (2022). review of landslide acceptable risk and tolerable risk. Geoenviron Disasters, 9 (3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-022-00205-6
Singh, U., Nandan, R., &Tiwari, A. (2024). Recent Trends and Techniques in Landslide Hazard Assessment. Qeios,4, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.32388/LBYEQN
Taloor, AK., Kumar, V., Kumar, SG., Singh, A.K., Kale, A.V., Sharma, R., Khajuria, V., Raina, G., Kouser, B., & Chowdhary, N.H. (2020). Land Use Land Cover Dynamics Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques in Western Doon Valley, Uttarakhand, India, Geoecology of Landscape Dynamics. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences, 1, 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2097-6_23
Tesfa, CH., & Sewnet, D. (2024). GIS-based MCDM approach for landslide hazard zonation mapping in east Gojjam zone, central Ethiopia. Quaternary Science Advances, 15 (10), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qsa.2024.100210
Ullah, K., Wang, Y., Li, P., Fang, Z., Rahaman, M., Ullah, S., & Hamed, M.M. (2024). Spatiotemporal dynamics of landslide susceptibility under future climate change and land use scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett, 19 (1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8a72
Vojtekova, J., & Vojtek, M. (2020). Assessment of landslide susceptibility at a localspatial scale applying the multi-criteria analysisand GIS: a case study from Slovaki, Geomatics. Natural Hazards and Risk, 11 (1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1713233