Landslide Hazard Zonation Using Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) and Remote Sensing Data in the Shahid Abbaspour Dam Catchment Area

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences and Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Department of Marine Geology, Faculty of Marine Natural Resources, Khorramshahr University of Marine Sciences and Technology, Khorramshahr, Iran.
10.22034/gmpj.2026.573236.1600
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Landslides are among the most devastating and costliest natural hazards worldwide, posing significant challenges to the sustainable management of mountainous and steep-slope regions. Iran, due to its diverse geological and climatic settings, is highly susceptible to various natural disasters, with landslides being particularly prevalent in the Zagros folded belt. The northeastern part of Khuzestan province, encompassing the Shahid Abbaspour Dam basin and its sub-basins (Northern and Southern Deh-Sheikh), experiences frequent landslide events due to a combination of active tectonics, erodible lithological formations, intense seasonal rainfall, and anthropogenic interventions such as road construction and land-use changes. Although numerous studies have employed machine learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping, a comprehensive comparative assessment of the controlling factors across multiple watersheds with distinct environmental settings remains lacking. This study, therefore, aims to: (1) evaluate the performance of the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) algorithm, (2) identify and prioritize the most influential environmental factors, (3) produce spatially explicit landslide hazard zonation maps, and (4) compare the driving mechanisms among the three watersheds, integrating field surveys, remote sensing data (Sentinel-2, ASTER GDEM), and GIS-based geospatial analyses.
Methodology
A total of 129 landslide occurrence points were compiled from geological survey databases, extensive field campaigns, and high-resolution Google Earth imagery interpretation. Fifteen conditioning factors were selected based on a systematic literature review and local geo-environmental conditions, including topographic parameters (elevation, slope, aspect, plan curvature), geological settings (lithology, distance to faults), hydrological indices (Topographic Wetness Index, Stream Power Index, distance to rivers), anthropogenic factors (distance to roads, land use/land cover), climatic variable (mean annual precipitation), soil texture, and vegetation cover (NDVI). All layers were resampled to a uniform spatial resolution of 30 m and standardized to a common coordinate system (UTM Zone 39N). Multicollinearity among predictors was assessed using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), and variables with VIF > 10 were excluded. The MaxEnt model was calibrated using 70% of the landslide points for training and 30% for testing, with 10-fold cross-validation to ensure robustness. Model performance was evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Area Under the Curve (AUC), supplemented by the True Skill Statistic (TSS) and Kappa coefficient. Variable importance was assessed through percent contribution and the Jackknife test, while response curves were employed to elucidate the nature of factor-landslide relationships. The final susceptibility maps were classified into five hazard classes (very low to very high) using the Natural Breaks (Jenks) optimization method.
Results
The MaxEnt model demonstrated excellent predictive performance across all three watersheds, with AUC values exceeding 0.90 for both training and testing datasets (Shahid Abbaspour: 0.908 and 0.906; Northern Deh-Sheikh: 0.970 and 0.908; Southern Deh-Sheikh: 0.929 and 0.978, respectively). These high AUC values, along with the close agreement between training and testing results, indicate robust model generalization and negligible overfitting. Jackknife tests revealed that all variables contributed positively to the model, but their relative importance varied markedly among watersheds. In the Shahid Abbaspour basin, precipitation (28.41%), lithology (20.99%), distance to roads (13.93%), and distance to faults (9.37%) were the dominant factors, with precipitation showing a clear threshold behavior at ~2600 mm/year. In Northern Deh-Sheikh, land use/land cover (14.07%), distance to roads (13.88%), distance to rivers (12.39%), and Stream Power Index (11.09%) were the primary controls, highlighting the overriding role of anthropogenic and hydrological drivers. In Southern Deh-Sheikh, lithology (24.99%), distance to roads (19.93%), distance to rivers (10.40%), and precipitation (10.39%) were most influential, with Quaternary deposits and Gachsaran Formation being the most susceptible lithological units. The hazard maps revealed distinct spatial patterns: the Shahid Abbaspour basin exhibited the largest area under high-hazard class (78.08 km², 30.19%), Northern Deh-Sheikh was predominantly classified as moderate hazard (79.55 km², 40.21%), while Southern Deh-Sheikh showed the most critical condition with the largest very-high-hazard zone (79.84 km², 33.21%). The combined high and very-high hazard classes covered over 53%, 27%, and 64% of the total area in the three basins, respectively.
Discussion and Conclusion
The results highlight the critical role of local environmental heterogeneity in landslide susceptibility. Inter-basin differences in factor importance—precipitation and lithology in Shahid Abbaspour and Southern Deh‑Sheikh versus anthropogenic/hydrological factors in Northern Deh‑Sheikh—reflect the complex interaction between natural predisposing factors and human triggers. The high susceptibility of the Gachsaran Formation (gypsum‑ and salt‑bearing evaporites) and Quaternary unconsolidated deposits explains elevated hazard levels in these units. A precipitation threshold of ~2600–3200 mm/year suggests saturation‑driven failure mechanisms predominate in high‑rainfall catchments. The consistent influence of roads across all basins underscores the role of anthropogenic slope modifications in exacerbating susceptibility. Excellent model performance (AUC, TSS, Kappa) confirms MaxEnt as a robust tool for landslide assessment in data‑scarce regions. However, limitations include imbalanced landslide sampling, coarse geological maps (1:100,000), and sole reliance on AUC, which may not fully capture performance in imbalanced datasets. Future work should employ data balancing techniques, integrate physically‑based models (e.g., TRIGRS) with statistical approaches, incorporate higher‑resolution geological/geotechnical data, and assess climate change impacts on rainfall‑induced slope instability. The susceptibility maps provide a scientific basis for prioritizing conservation, guiding urban planning, and developing region‑specific mitigation strategies in the Zagros and similar mountainous regions worldwide.
Keywords

حلاجی، م.، زنگنه اسدی، م.ع.، و امیراحمدی، ا. (1399). ارزیابی کارآیی مدل‌های پیش‌بینی حساسیت وقوع زمین‌لغزش در آبخیز بار نیشابور. پژوهش‌های آبخیزداری، 33(2)، 20-30 Doi: 10.22092/wmej.2019.126950.1241. 
ساداتی، س.ح.، موسوی، س.ر.، وهاب‌زاده کبریا، ق.، و روشان، س.ح. (1404). ارزیابی مدل‌های جنگل تصادفی و ماشین بردار پشتیبان در تهیه نقشه حساسیت زمین‌لغزش (مطالعه موردی: حوضه تجن، استان مازندران). مخاطرات محیط طبیعی، 14(45)، 133-154. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2025.50031.2071
دسترنج، ع.، و کریمی سنگچینی، ا. (1401). پیش‌بینی حساسیت وقوع زمین‌لغزش با الگوریتم یادگیری ماشین بیشینه آنتروپی (حوزه آبخیز بار نیشابور). پژوهش‌های دانش زمین، 13(3)، 76-96. doi: 10.48308/esrj.2022.102965
ذاکری‌نژاد، ر.ا.، و عموشاهی، ن. (1401). ارزیابی خطر زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از داده‌های سنجش از دور و مدل حداکثر آنتروپی (منطقه مورد مطالعه: حوضه آبخیز کمه، جنوب استان اصفهان). پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 11(2)، 128-149.
. doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2022.340900.1349
کریمی سنگچینی، ا.، دسترنج، ع.، آرامی، س.ح.، شادفر، ص.، و ویسکرمی، ا. (1403). کاربرد الگوریتم یادگیری ماشین بیشینه آنتروپی در پهنه‌بندی خطر زمین‌لغزش حوزه آبخیز کرگانه، استان لرستان. علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری ایران، 18(64)، 50-63. http://jwmsei.ir/article-1-1129-FA-HTML
مجدباوی، ا.، و مومی‌پور، م. (1400). پهنه‌بندی مناطق مستعد خطر زمین‌لغزش در محدوده سد شهید عباسپور. جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 37، 65-80. doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.67029.0.
مهرپویا، م.ر.، و قویمی پناه، م.ح. (1403). شناسایی عوامل موثر و پهنه‌بندی خطر زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از روش حداکثر آنتروپی. مدل‌سازی و مدیریت آب و خاک، 5(1)، 247-264. . doi: 10.22098/mmws.2024.14799.1436
موسوی، س.م.، عابدینی، م.، و اسمعلی عوری، ا. (1394). ارزیابی خطر زمین‌لرزه در حوزه شهری ایذه با استفاده از مدل‌های چندمعیاری WLC و AHP در محیط GIS. فصلنامه مدیریت بحران، 7(7)، 93-101.
موسوی، س.س.، و رحیمی، م. (1399). پهنه‌بندی و ارزیابی خطر ناپایداری شیب در شهرستان مسجدسلیمان با استفاده از تحلیل سلسله مراتبی و نسبت فراوانی. زمین‌شناسی کاربردی پیشرفته، 10(37)، 468-487.
Doi: 10.22055/aag.2020.32948.2102
نگهبان,س , پی سوزی,ت , گنجائیان,ح و نوروزی,م . (1400). شناسایی مناطق مستعد وقوع زمین‌لغزش و جابجایی عمودی با استفاده از تصاویر راداری (مطالعه موردی: محدوده شهری و حاشیه شهری لواسان)جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 10(3) ، 1-18.   Doi: 10.22067/geoeh.2021.71728.1094
نگهبان، سعید، مرحمت، مهری و علی نژاد، حمید . (1404). ارزیابی و پهنه‌بندی حساسیت زمین لغزش با الگوریتم-های یادگیری ماشین (مطالعه موردی حوضه آبخیز مارگون، زاگرس فارس)پژوهشهای ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 14(2)، 42-61.
https://doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2025.474854.1519
Boussouf, B., Fernández, T. A., & Hart, B. (2023). Landslide susceptibility mapping using maximum entropy (MaxEnt) and geographically weighted logistic regression (GWLR) models in the Río Aguas catchment (Almería, SE Spain). Natural Hazards, 117(1), 207-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05857-7
Chen, W., Chen, X., Peng, J., Panahi, M., & Lee, S. (2021). Landslide susceptibility modeling based on ANFIS with teaching-learning-based optimization and satin bowerbird optimizer. Geoscience Frontiers, 12(1), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.07.012
Chen, W., & Li, Y. (2020). GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility using hybrid computational intelligence models. Catena, 195, 104777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104777
Cheng, Y.-S., Yu, T.-T., & Son, N.-T. (2021). Random forests for landslide prediction in Tsengwen River Watershed, Central Taiwan. Remote Sensing, 13(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020199
Convertino, M., Troccoli, M., & Catani, F. (2013). Detecting fingerprints of landslide drivers: A MaxEnt model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118, 1367-1386. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20099
Dastranj, A., & Karimi, E. (2022). Landslide susceptibility predicting using the maximum entropy machine learning algorithm (Bar catchment of Nishapur). Researches in Earth Sciences, 13(3), 76-96. https://doi.org/10.48308/esrj.2022.102965
Davis, J., & Blesius, L. (2015). A hybrid physical and maximum-entropy landslide susceptibility model. Entropy, 17, 4271-4292. https://doi.org/10.3390/e17064271
He, J. Y., Qiu, H. J., Qu, F. H., Hu, S., Yang, D., Shen, Y., et al. (2020). Prediction of spatiotemporal stability and rainfall threshold of shallow landslides using the TRIGRS and Scoops3D models. Catena, 197, 104999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104999
Kornejady, A., Ownegh, M., & Bahremand, A. (2017). Landslide susceptibility assessment using maximum entropy model with two different data sampling methods. Catena, 152, 144-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.010
Li, S., Liu, M., Ji, L., & Wang, F. (2024). Regional analysis of the potential distribution of Heptacodium miconioides and its competitor species in China. Sustainability, 16(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05857-7
Pandey, V. K., Pourghasemi, H. R., & Sharma, M. C. (2018). Landslide susceptibility mapping using maximum entropy and support vector machine models along the highway corridor, Garhwal Himalaya. Geocarto International, 35(2), 168-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1510038
Ramos-Bernal, R., Vázquez-Jiménez, R., & Rojas, W. (2024). Landslide potential mapping applying maximum entropy to continuous change maps. Applied Geomatics, 16(4), 951-971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-024-00596-1
Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., Mihir, M., & Guzzetti, F. (2018). A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Science Reviews, 180, 60-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001
Shi, J. (2022). Engineering application of landslide susceptibility mapping in linear engineering optimization. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 861057. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.861057
Su, Q., Tao, W., Mei, S., Zhang, X., Li, K., Su, X., et al. (2021). Landslide susceptibility zoning using C5.0 decision tree, random forest, support vector machine and comparison of their performance in a coal mine area. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, 781472. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.781472
Sun, D., Wen, H., Wang, D., & Xu, J. (2020). A random forest model of landslide susceptibility mapping based on hyperparameter optimization using Bayes algorithm. Geomorphology, 362, 107201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107201
Tanyas, H., Gorum, T., Kirschbaum, D. B., & Lombardo, L. (2020). Could road constructions be more disastrous than an earthquake in terms of landsliding? Earth's Future, 12, 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10503922.1
Xu, X., Qiang, Y., Li, L., Liang, S., Chen, T., Yang, W., Tan, X., Wang, X., & Yang, H. (2025). A MaxEnt-TRIGRS hybrid model with dynamic safety factor mapping for enhanced debris flow susceptibility assessment in rainfall-triggered terrains. Scientific Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11284-4
Yuan, S. H., Huang, G., Xiong, H., Gong, Q., Wang, J., & Chen, J. (2017). Maximum entropy-based model of high-threat landslide disaster distribution in Zhaoqing, China. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.2991/jrarc.2017.7.3.2