Comparative Assessment of Morphological Quality in Rivers on the Northern and Southern Slopes of the Alborz Mountains: A Case Study of the Vaz River and Hajimahrud (Chamestan-Noor), Hablehrud River (Garmsar), and Shahrud River (Rajaei Dasht-e Alamut)
Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1
Department of Physical Geography, Earth Sciences Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2
Department of Physical Geography, Earth Sciences Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
3
Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Mazandaran University, Babolsar, Iran
10.22034/gmpj.2025.518899.1558
Abstract
Introduction
Rivers have garnered increasing attention due to their role in delivering diverse ecosystem services. In recent decades, river morphology has undergone frequent alterations as a result of climate change and anthropogenic factors. In Iran, rivers have been subjected to significant pressures due to extensive human interventions, including sand and gravel mining, dam construction, channel diversion, bank stabilization, and water resource exploitation.
A key tool in this field is the Revised Morphological Quality Index (rMQI), developed to enable a more precise analysis of riverine physical processes. This index provides a comprehensive assessment of a river's physical condition by evaluating three critical aspects: the intensity of anthropogenic pressures, the degree of morphological alterations, and the ecological and geomorphological functionality of the river.
The objective of this study is to understand the dynamic processes shaping the channel and the morphological changes of the Vaz, and Hajimahrud Hablehrud, and Shahrud rivers over time. Using the Revised Morphological Quality Index (rMQI) method—based on the Human Pressure Index, Channel Form Adjustment Index, and Meandering Functionality Index—the morphological quality of the studied rivers was assessed. The findings of this research can inform decision-making processes aimed at mitigating environmental risks and optimizing river management practices.
Methodology
T he rivers studied in this research include the Vaz River and Hajimahrud (Chamestan, Nour), the Hablehrud River (Garmsar), and the Shahrud River (Rajaei Dasht-e Alamut). To collect high-resolution morphometric data, field surveys and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones (using stereoscopic imaging or short-range photogrammetry), were employed for image acquisition. Based on field surveys and the use of a digital elevation model (DEM), morphometric parameters of the channel, channel characteristics, and human interventions were recorded and derived.
The revised Morphological Quality Index (rMQI) method was used to assess the morphological quality of the studied rivers. This method evaluates the qualitative status of rivers by applying and measuring a set of indicators, including Pressure Indicators (PI) and Channel Adjustment and Functioning Indicators (AI). The rMQI method examines the morphological quality status based on 12 human pressure indicators and 21 channel alteration indicators, consisting of 10 channel form adjustment indicators and 11 functional indicators.
Results
Through field surveys and processing of drone-captured images at different time intervals, the relevant indicators for each river segment were identified. Subsequently, measurements, calculations, and data scoring were performed using the rMQI method.
Hajimahrud River: The values obtained from the pressure index parameters in the first and second segments were 37.5 % and 42.19 %, respectively, while the channel adjustment change/trend indicators in the first segment were 70 % and 70 % in the second segment. Based on these data, the rMQI values were calculated as 45.18 % for the first segment and 47.53 % for the second segment. The morphological quality of both segments of the Vaz River was assessed as moderate.
Vaz River: The study area along the Vaz River was divided into two segments. The values obtained from the pressure index parameters in the first and second segments were 31.25% and 54.39%, respectively, while the channel adjustment change/trend indicators in the first segment were 54.39% and 51.75% in the second segment. Based on these data, the rMQI values were calculated as 42.82% for the first segment and 41.5% for the second segment. The morphological quality of both segments of the Vaz River was assessed as moderate.
Hablehrud River:The study area along the Hablehrud River was divided into three segments. The values obtained from the pressure index parameters were 7.87% in the first segment, 28.75% in the second, and 15.63% in the third. The channel adjustment change/trend indicators were 64.91% in the first segment, 60.53% in the second, and 67.54% in the third. Based on these data, the rMQI values were calculated as 36.39% for the first segment, 44.64% for the second, and 41.58% for the third. The morphological quality of all three segments of the Hablehrud River was assessed as moderate.
Shahrud River: The study area along the Shahrud River was divided into two segments. The values obtained from the pressure index parameters were 20.31% in the first segment and 25% in the second, while the channel adjustment change/trend indicators were 30.7% in both segments. Based on these data, the rMQI values were calculated as 25.51% for the first segment and 27.85% for the second. The morphological quality of both segments of the Shahrud River was assessed as good.
Discussion and Conclusion
The assessment of the morphological quality of the studied river sections using the rMQI method revealed that the examined reaches of the Vaz River and Hajimahrud exhibit moderate quality. This condition is attributed to the presence of three severe and one moderate anthropogenic pressure, as well as unfavorable morphological alterations and channel functionality. Similarly, the studied reaches of the Hablehrud River were found to be in a comparable state to those of the Vaz River, resulting in a moderate morphological quality. In contrast, the examined sections of the Shahrud River demonstrated good morphological quality, owing to minimal human pressures and favorable conditions in channel planform dynamics and functionality over time. The superior morphological quality of the Shahrud River may be linked to the absence of intensive management and exploitation pressures. These studied reaches are located in mountainous areas, distant from densely populated urban and rural settlements.
The findings from the Vaz, Hajimahrud, Hablehrud, and Shahrud Rivers indicate that human interventions—such as sand and gravel mining, channelization, and unsustainable water extraction—have significant adverse impacts on the hydrogeomorphological conditions of rivers.
Rivers have garnered increasing attention due to their role in delivering diverse ecosystem services. In recent decades, river morphology has undergone frequent alterations as a result of climate change and anthropogenic factors. In Iran, rivers have been subjected to significant pressures due to extensive human interventions, including sand and gravel mining, dam construction, channel diversion, bank stabilization, and water resource exploitation.
A key tool in this field is the Revised Morphological Quality Index (rMQI), developed to enable a more precise analysis of riverine physical processes. This index provides a comprehensive assessment of a river's physical condition by evaluating three critical aspects: the intensity of anthropogenic pressures, the degree of morphological alterations, and the ecological and geomorphological functionality of the river.
The objective of this study is to understand the dynamic processes shaping the channel and the morphological changes of the Vaz, and Hajimahrud Hablehrud, and Shahrud rivers over time. Using the Revised Morphological Quality Index (rMQI) method—based on the Human Pressure Index, Channel Form Adjustment Index, and Meandering Functionality Index—the morphological quality of the studied rivers was assessed. The findings of this research can inform decision-making processes aimed at mitigating environmental risks and optimizing river management practices.
Methodology
T he rivers studied in this research include the Vaz River and Hajimahrud (Chamestan, Nour), the Hablehrud River (Garmsar), and the Shahrud River (Rajaei Dasht-e Alamut). To collect high-resolution morphometric data, field surveys and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones (using stereoscopic imaging or short-range photogrammetry), were employed for image acquisition. Based on field surveys and the use of a digital elevation model (DEM), morphometric parameters of the channel, channel characteristics, and human interventions were recorded and derived.
The revised Morphological Quality Index (rMQI) method was used to assess the morphological quality of the studied rivers. This method evaluates the qualitative status of rivers by applying and measuring a set of indicators, including Pressure Indicators (PI) and Channel Adjustment and Functioning Indicators (AI). The rMQI method examines the morphological quality status based on 12 human pressure indicators and 21 channel alteration indicators, consisting of 10 channel form adjustment indicators and 11 functional indicators.
Results
Through field surveys and processing of drone-captured images at different time intervals, the relevant indicators for each river segment were identified. Subsequently, measurements, calculations, and data scoring were performed using the rMQI method.
Hajimahrud River: The values obtained from the pressure index parameters in the first and second segments were 37.5 % and 42.19 %, respectively, while the channel adjustment change/trend indicators in the first segment were 70 % and 70 % in the second segment. Based on these data, the rMQI values were calculated as 45.18 % for the first segment and 47.53 % for the second segment. The morphological quality of both segments of the Vaz River was assessed as moderate.
Vaz River: The study area along the Vaz River was divided into two segments. The values obtained from the pressure index parameters in the first and second segments were 31.25% and 54.39%, respectively, while the channel adjustment change/trend indicators in the first segment were 54.39% and 51.75% in the second segment. Based on these data, the rMQI values were calculated as 42.82% for the first segment and 41.5% for the second segment. The morphological quality of both segments of the Vaz River was assessed as moderate.
Hablehrud River:The study area along the Hablehrud River was divided into three segments. The values obtained from the pressure index parameters were 7.87% in the first segment, 28.75% in the second, and 15.63% in the third. The channel adjustment change/trend indicators were 64.91% in the first segment, 60.53% in the second, and 67.54% in the third. Based on these data, the rMQI values were calculated as 36.39% for the first segment, 44.64% for the second, and 41.58% for the third. The morphological quality of all three segments of the Hablehrud River was assessed as moderate.
Shahrud River: The study area along the Shahrud River was divided into two segments. The values obtained from the pressure index parameters were 20.31% in the first segment and 25% in the second, while the channel adjustment change/trend indicators were 30.7% in both segments. Based on these data, the rMQI values were calculated as 25.51% for the first segment and 27.85% for the second. The morphological quality of both segments of the Shahrud River was assessed as good.
Discussion and Conclusion
The assessment of the morphological quality of the studied river sections using the rMQI method revealed that the examined reaches of the Vaz River and Hajimahrud exhibit moderate quality. This condition is attributed to the presence of three severe and one moderate anthropogenic pressure, as well as unfavorable morphological alterations and channel functionality. Similarly, the studied reaches of the Hablehrud River were found to be in a comparable state to those of the Vaz River, resulting in a moderate morphological quality. In contrast, the examined sections of the Shahrud River demonstrated good morphological quality, owing to minimal human pressures and favorable conditions in channel planform dynamics and functionality over time. The superior morphological quality of the Shahrud River may be linked to the absence of intensive management and exploitation pressures. These studied reaches are located in mountainous areas, distant from densely populated urban and rural settlements.
The findings from the Vaz, Hajimahrud, Hablehrud, and Shahrud Rivers indicate that human interventions—such as sand and gravel mining, channelization, and unsustainable water extraction—have significant adverse impacts on the hydrogeomorphological conditions of rivers.
Keywords
اسماعیلی، ر.، متولی، ص و حسین زاده، م.م.، 1391. بررسی اثرات مورفوتکتونیک در نیمرخ طولی رودخانه واز؛البرز شمالی، استان مازندران. پژوهش های ژئومورفوۀوژی کمی، ، شماره3 ،صص 101 - 114 .
اسماعیلی، ر و ولی خانی، س.، 1397. ارزیابی و تحلیل شرایط هیدرومورفولوژیکی رودخانهی لاویج با استفاده از شاخص کیفیت مورفولوژیکی، پژوهشهای ژئومورفولوژی کمی، دوره2، شماره4،صص37-53.
ایلانلو، م و کرم، ا.، 1399. ارزیابی شرایط هیدرومورفولوژیکی رودخانه جاجرود با استفاده از روشrMQI . . تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، دوره20، شماره56، صص 35-53.
رضایی، م.، خالقی، س و حسین زاده، م.م.، 1401. ارزیابی شرایط هیدرومورفولوژی طالقان رود جهت برنامه ریزی محیطی با استفاده از روش های MQI و RQI جغرافیا و پایداری محیط، دوره 12، شماره4 ،صص 101 - 117 .
طالبی، ز.، ایوب زاده، س ع.، مصطفوی.، ح.، حسین زاده، م م و شفیع زاده، ح .، 1403. تحلیل و ارزیابی مورفولوژیک رودخانه مبتنی بر ویژگیهای مورفولوژیک، سازههای مصنوعی و تنظیمات آبراهه (مطالعه موردی: رودخانه تالار- از بالادست تا شیرگاه). علوم محیطی، دوره22، شماره1، صص 21-38.
فندرسکی، ن.، مسعودیان, م و راتچر، ک .، 1404. ارزیابی شرایط هیدرومورفولوژیکی رودخانه تجن با استفاده از روشHMQI.، مهندسی و مدیریت آبخیز، دوره14، شماره2، صص 185-201.
کرم، ا.، صفاری، ا.، سلیمانی، م و الهیاری,، ا.، 1400. تحلیل شرایط مورفولوژیک کریدور رودخانهای کن در کلانشهر تهران با استفاده از روش MQI، اقتصاد و برنامه ریزی شهری دوره 2، شماره 4، صص 326-339.
یعقوب نژاد اصل، ن.، اسفندیاری داراباد، فـ.، اصغری سراسکانرود، ص و کرم، ا.، 1399. ارزیابی کیفیت مورفولوژیک رودخانه طالقان،. مهندسی و مدیریت آبخیز، دوره12، شماره3، صص 657-669.
References
Agnihotri, A. K., Ohri, A., & Mishra, S. (2020). Channel planform dynamics of lower Ramganga River, Ganga basin, GIS and remote sensing analyses. Geocarto International, 35(9), 934-953.
Arnaud-Fassetta, G., & Fort, M. (2004). La part respective des facteurs hydroclimatiques et anthropiques dans l'évolution récente (1956-2000) de la bande active du Haut Guil, Queyras, Alpes françaises du Sud. Méditerranée, 102(1), 143-156.
Belletti, B., Rinaldi, M., Buijse, A. D., Gurnell, A. M., & Mosselman, E. (2015). A review of assessment methods for river hydromorphology. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, 2079-2100.
Best, J., & Darby, S. E. (2020). The pace of human-induced change in large rivers: Stresses, resilience, and vulnerability to extreme events. One Earth, 2(6), 510-514.
Boota, M. W., Yan, C., Idrees, M. B., Li, Z., Soomro, S. E. H., Dou, M., ... & Yousaf, A. (2021). Assessment of the morphological trends and sediment dynamics in the Indus River, Pakistan. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 12(7), 3082-3098.
Esmaili, R. & Valikhani, S. (2018). Evaluation and analysis of hydromorphological conditions of Lavij River using morphological quality index, Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 2(4), 37-53. [in Persian]
Esmaili, R., Motevalli, S. & Hosseinzadeh, M.M. (2012). Investigation of morphotectonic effects in the longitudinal profile of the Vaz River; Northern Alborz, Mazandaran Province, Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 1(3), 101-114. [in Persian]
Fendersky, N., Masoudian, M. & Ratcher, K. (2015). Assessment of hydromorphological conditions of the Tajan River using the HMQI method., Watershed Engineering and Management, 14 (2), 185-201. [in Persian]
Grill, G., Lehner, B., Thieme, M., Geenen, B., Tickner, D., Antonelli, F., ... & Zarfl, C. (2019). Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature, 569(7755), 215-221.
Habersack, H., Hein, T., Stanica, A., Liska, I., Mair, R., Jäger, E., ... & Bradley, C. (2016). Challenges of river basin management: Current status of, and prospects for, the River Danube from a river engineering perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 543, 828-845.
Ilanloo, M. & Karam, A. (2020). Assessment of hydromorphological conditions of the river using the MQI method (Case study area: JAJROOD River). jgs. 20(56), 35-53. doi:10.29252/jgs.20.56.35 URL: http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3017-fa.html. [in Persian]
Ioana-Toroimac, G., Zaharia, L., & Minea, G. (2015). Using pressure and alteration indicators to assess river morphological quality: case study of the Prahova River (Romania). Water, 7(6), 2971-2989.
karam, A., saffari, A., soleimani,M. & allahyari, A. (2021). Analysis of morphological conditions of Kan river corridor in Tehran metropolis using MQI method. Urban Economics and Planning, 2(4), 326-339. doi: 10.22034/UE.2022.2.04.06. [in Persian]
Kiss, T., & Blanka, V. (2012). River channel response to climate-and human-induced hydrological changes: Case study on the meandering Hernád River, Hungary. Geomorphology, 175, 115-125.
Kleinhans, M. G., De Haas, T., Lavooi, E., & Makaske, B. (2012). Evaluating competing hypotheses for the origin and dynamics of river anastomosis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37(12), 1337-1351.
Lemay, J., M. Biron, P., Boivin, M., Stämpfli, N.,& Foote, K. (2021). Can the Morphological Quality Index (MQI) be used to determine the ecological status of lowland rivers?. Geomorphology, 395, ,108002,ISSN 0169-555X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.108002.
Li, Z., Yan, C., & Boota, M. W. (2022). Review and outlook of river morphology expression. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 13(4), 1725-1747.
Liébault, F., & Piégay, H. (2002). Causes of 20th century channel narrowing in mountain and piedmont rivers of southeastern France. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group, 27(4), 425-444.
Macklin, M. G., & Lewin, J. (2019). River stresses in anthropogenic times: Large-scale global patterns and extended environmental timelines. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 43(1), 3-23.
Orah Rein Moshe, F., Sternberg, M., Ratner, T., Drori, I., & Egozi, R. ( 2022). Customizing the Morphological Quality Index (MQI) to evaluate streams in Eastern-Mediterranean ecosystems. Environmental Challenges, 9, 100612,ISSN 2667-0100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100612.
Postel, S. L., Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1996). Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science, 271(5250), 785-788.
Postel, S. L. (1998). Water for food production: will there be enough in 2025?. BioScience, 48(8), 629-637.
Zhang, L., Yuan, B., Yin, X., & Zhao, Y. (2019). The influence of channel morphological changes on environmental flow requirements in urban rivers. Water, 11(9), 1800.
Rezaei, M., Khaleghi, S., & Hosseinzadeh, M. M. (2022). The Evaluation of Hydromorphological Conditions of Taleghan River Using MQI and RQI Methods for Environmental Planning. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 12(4), 101-117. doi: 10.22126/ges.2022.7973.2548. [in Persian]
Rinaldi, M., Surian, N., Comiti, F., & Bussettini, M. (2013). A method for the assessment and analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: The Morphological Quality Index (MQI). Geomorphology, 180, 96-108.
Stecca, G., Zolezzi, G., Hicks, D. M., & Surian, N. (2019). Reduced braiding of rivers in human-modified landscapes: Converging trajectories and diversity of causes. Earth-science reviews, 188, 291-311.
Stefanidis, K., Kouvarda, T., Latsiou, A., Papaioannou, G., Gritzalis, K., & Dimitriou, E. (2022). A comparative evaluation of Hydromorphological assessment methods applied in rivers of Greece. Hydrology, 9(3), 43.
Talebi, Z., Ayyoubzadeh, S. A., Mostafavi, H., Hosseinzadeh, M. M. & Shafizadeh, H. (2024). Morphological Analysis and Assessment of a River Based on Morphological Characteristics, Artificial Structures and Channel Adjustment (Case Study: Talar River - Upstream of the Shirgah). Advanced Environmental Sciences, 22(1), 21-38. doi: 10.48308/envs.2023.1250, [in Persian]
Tulbure, M. G., Broich, M., Stehman, S. V., & Kommareddy, A. (2016). Surface water extent dynamics from three decades of seasonally continuous Landsat time series at subcontinental scale in a semi-arid region. Remote Sensing of Environment, 178, 142-157.
Van Vliet, M. T., Franssen, W. H., Yearsley, J. R., Ludwig, F., Haddeland, I., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Kabat, P. (2013). Global river discharge and water temperature under climate change. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 450-464.
Wyżga, B., Zawiejska, J., Radecki‐Pawlik, A., & Hajdukiewicz, H. (2012). Environmental change, hydromorphological reference conditions and the restoration of Polish Carpathian rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37(11), 1213-1226.
Yousefi, S., Moradi, H. R., Keesstra, S., Pourghasemi, H. R., Navratil, O., & Hooke, J. (2019). Effects of urbanization on river morphology of the Talar River, Mazandarn Province, Iran. Geocarto International, 34(3), 276-292.
Yaghoub Nejad Asl, N., Esfandiari Darabad, F., Asghari Saraskanroud, S. & Karam, A. (2019). Morphological quality assessment of Taleghan River. Watershed Engineering and Management, 12 (3), 657-669. [in Persian]
Yu, S. Y., Li, W. J., Zhou, L., Yu, X., Zhang, Q., & Shen, Z. (2023). Human disturbances dominated the unprecedentedly high frequency of Yellow River flood over the last millennium. Science Advances, 9(8), eadf8576.
Ziliani, L., & Surian, N. (2012). Evolutionary trajectory of channel morphology and controlling factors in a large gravel-bed river. Geomorphology, 173, 104-117.
