Quantitative Geomorphological Analysis of Sand Dunes Using UAV-based Aerial Mapping: A Case Study of Kalateh Mazinan, Razavi Khorasan Province

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Arid Zone Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.
2 Department of Arid Zone and Desert Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
3 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University
4 Desert Research Department, National Forest and Rangeland Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization
10.22034/gmpj.2026.546502.1580
Abstract
Introduction:

Sand dunes, especially barchan dunes, represent some of the most visually striking and dynamically responsive landforms in Earth’s arid and semi-arid landscapes. Characterized by their crescentic shape, sharp horns, and steep slip faces, barchan dunes form under conditions of limited sand supply and unidirectional wind regimes. Their mobility and morphological plasticity make them sensitive indicators of environmental change, serving as natural recorders of wind patterns, sediment availability, and surface roughness. In regions such as the Kalateh Mazinan area in northeastern Iran — situated within the expansive arid belt of Razavi Khorasan Province — barchan dunes are not merely passive features but active agents of landscape transformation. Monitoring their behavior is critical not only for advancing fundamental geomorphological knowledge but also for practical applications including desertification control, infrastructure planning, agricultural zoning, and ecological conservation.

Despite their significance, comprehensive, high-resolution spatiotemporal analyses of barchan dune dynamics in Iran — and particularly in the Kalateh Mazinan region — remain scarce. Most previous studies have relied on coarse-resolution satellite imagery or infrequent field surveys, which often fail to capture the subtle yet critical micro-scale changes in dune morphology and position. This study addresses this gap by employing cutting-edge unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry to generate precise, time-series digital elevation models (DEMs) and orthophotos, enabling detailed quantification of dune migration and structural evolution over a 29-month interval (May 2022 to October 2024).



Materials and Methods:

The methodological framework of this research integrates advanced remote sensing techniques with classical geomorphometric analysis. Two high-resolution aerial surveys were conducted using a DJI Phantom 4 Pro drone, capturing overlapping nadir and oblique imagery under optimal lighting and wind conditions to minimize motion blur and shadowing. The imagery was processed using industry-standard photogrammetric software — Agisoft Metashape and Pix4Dmapper — to reconstruct 3D point clouds, orthomosaics, and DEMs with centimeter-level accuracy. Five morphologically distinct barchan dunes were selected as representative samples based on their spatial distribution, isolation from neighboring features, and clarity of form. For each dune, a suite of 12 quantitative parameters was extracted: planimetric area, perimeter, mean and maximum elevation, volume, windward and leeward slope angles, lengths of both horns (arms), inter-arm width, and crestline orientation. Crucially, displacement was measured by tracking three fiducial points — the tips of the windward and leeward arms, and the apex of the crest — across the two epochs. The arithmetic mean of these three displacement vectors was taken as the representative migration distance for each dune.



Results:

Results indicate a wide spectrum of dune mobility and morphological response. Total displacement ranged from 9.47 meters (Dune 5) to 27.76 meters (Dune 4), yielding a regional average migration rate of 20.57 meters over the study period — equivalent to approximately 8.5 meters per year. Dunes 1, 2, and 3 exhibited moderate volumetric growth (ranging from +3% to +7%) and elongation along the dominant northwest–southeast axis, suggesting sediment accumulation and forward propagation under consistent wind forcing. Dune 4, the most mobile feature, displayed morphological signs of coalescence with a neighboring dune, including flattening of the inter-dune depression and merging of slip faces — a phenomenon indicative of dune field maturation and potential transition toward transverse or barchanoid ridge forms. In contrast, Dune 5 remained relatively static, with minimal displacement and unchanged volume, possibly due to local topographic sheltering, higher soil moisture retention, or the presence of sparse vegetation anchoring the surface sediment.

Correlation analysis revealed that displacement rate was positively associated with initial dune volume and windward arm length in three of the five dunes, aligning with theoretical models that link dune size to mobility under constant wind stress. However, Dune 5’s anomalous behavior — large size yet low mobility — underscores the influence of localized environmental controls, such as microtopography, sediment cohesion, or anthropogenic barriers. Slope asymmetry (steeper leeward faces) was consistent across all dunes and aligned with the regional wind regime, further validating the unidirectionality of aeolian transport in the study area.



Discussion:

The discussion contextualizes these findings within broader aeolian geomorphology literature. The observed migration rates fall within the expected range for mid-latitude desert dunes under moderate wind regimes (cf. Baddock et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2020). The detection of dune merging processes adds empirical support to conceptual models of dune field evolution, wherein isolated barchans progressively interact, coalesce, and reorganize into more complex morphologies. Methodologically, this study demonstrates that UAV-based photogrammetry offers unparalleled spatial and temporal resolution compared to traditional techniques, enabling detection of sub-meter-scale changes and facilitating process-based interpretation rather than mere descriptive mapping.



Conclusion:

In conclusion, this research provides a robust, replicable framework for monitoring barchan dune dynamics using low-cost, high-efficiency UAV platforms. The findings confirm the dominant control of regional wind patterns on dune form and migration in Kalateh Mazinan, while also highlighting the modulating role of local factors. These insights are vital for predictive modeling of desert landscape evolution and for designing targeted interventions to mitigate dune encroachment on human settlements and agricultural lands. Future research should expand the temporal scope of monitoring, integrate in-situ meteorological data (particularly wind speed and direction), and explore seasonal variations in dune activity to build more comprehensive predictive models under scenarios of climatic variability and land-use change.
Keywords

آرامش، م. ولی،ع..، رنجبر، ا.، (1402). بررسی شاخص‌های ژئومورفولوژیکی و رابطه آن با پوشش گیاهی در تپه‌های ماسه‌ای (مطالعه موردی: آران و بیدگل و کاشان)، پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 12(1)، 131-114.
پورمرتضی، س.، غلامی، ح.، راشکی، ع.، و مرادی، ن. (۱۴۰۲). برآورد کمی تپه‌های ماسه‌ای با استفاده از تصویربرداری با پهپاد درمنطقه فراخشک سیستان. فصلنامه سنجش از دور و سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی در منابع طبیعی، ۱۴(۴)، ۷۵۹۲.
رضایی عارفی، م.، مقیمی، ا.، جعفر بگلو، م.، حسینی، س.، فخری، م. (1404). تحلیل ژئومورفولوژیک منطقه کپه داغ با استفاده از تئوری گسیختگی سطحی پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی،13(4) ، 203181.
سیف،ع.، موسوی، س.،(1391)، رزیابی شاخص‌های مورفودینامیک تپه­های برخانی (مطالعه‌ی موردی: ریگ چاه‌جام)، پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 11(1) ، 181.
یوسفی، م.ج.، حسینعلی‌زاده، م.، راشکی،ع.، کریمی‌نژاد، ن.، عباسی،ح.، و محمدیان بهبهانی،ع.، (1403). تحلیل توزیع مکانی و برهم‌کنش تپه‌های ماسه‌ای مطالعۀ موردی (منطقۀ کلاته مزینان)مهندسی اکوسیستم بیابان ۱۳(۴۲)، ۳۹۵۲.
Abdel Wahed, M., Khalifa, M. A., Abd El-Aal, A. K., & Hassan, M. A. (2023). Morphometry, migration rates, and environmental hazards of barchan dunes in the Kharga Depression, Western Desert, Egypt. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 16(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11238-y
Ait-Lamallam, A., Lahrich, S., & El Khamlichi, A. (2025). Minimizing Bowl Effect in UAV Photogrammetry Using Optimized Flight Parameters. Drones, 9(6), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9060387
Andrews, S., Bradbury, A., & Clayton, K. (2002). Techniques for GIS modeling of coastal dunes. Journal of Coastal Research, 18(4), 997–1002. https://doi.org/10.2112/03A-0050.1
Burchi, R., & Theuerkauf, K. (2024). High-resolution comparison of LiDAR and sUAS-SfM DEMs in arid dune environments. Scientific Reports, 14, 63466.
Barchyn, T. E., & Hugenholtz, C. H. (2012). Topographic and volumetric change in a dryland dune field using terrestrial laser scanning. Geomorphology, 188, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.05.016
Bond, H., Pontiki, M., Wengrove, M., Puleo, J. A., Evans, T. M., & Feagin, R. A. (2023). Beach and dune subsurface hydrodynamics and their influence on the formation of dune scarps. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 128(7), e2023JF007298. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JF007298
Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Li, F., & Wang, X. (2023). Real-Time Kinematic Positioning (RTK) for Monitoring of Barchan Dune Migration in the Kumtagh Desert, China. Remote Sensing, 15(19), 4728. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194728
Corrado, P., Di Gennaro, S. F., & Mouratidis, V. (2021). Uncertainty of drone‑derived DEMs and significance of detected morphodynamics in artificially scraped dunes. Remote Sensing, 13(9), 1823. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091823
Cruz, C., O’Connell, J., McGuinness, K., Martin, J. R., Perrin, P. M., & Connolly, J. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of UAV data for accurate coastal dune habitat mapping. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 56(1), 2191870. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2023.2191870
Durand, N., Tassi, P., Blanpain, O., & Lefebvre, A. (2025). Meteorological conditions influence the migration of a marine dune field in the southern North Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 130(5), e2024JF007731. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JF007731
Eltner, A., Jaud, M., Kaiser, A., & Mandlburger, G. (2017). Radiometric correction and its impact on UAV-based 3D surface modeling in forested terrain. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 128, 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.03.011
Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., Castillo, C., Rock, G., Neugirg, F., & Abellan, A. (2015). Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry – merits, limits and developments of a promising tool for geoscientists. Earth Surface Dynamics Discussions, 3, 1445–1508. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurfd-3-1445-2015
Ekaso, D., Turan, O., & Ince, S. (2024). Accuracy Assessment of RTK and PPK GNSS Systems on UAVs in the Absence of GCPs. Drones, 9(4), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040291
Faelga, J., Corenblit, D., & Esteves, M. (2023). Monitoring Aeolian Landforms Using UAV-Derived DEMs: A Case Study from Northern Adriatic. Remote Sensing, 15(12), 3021. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123021
Fernandez, T., Müller, C., & Zhao, H. (2025). Integrated UAV-GIS modeling of dune morphology under climate stress. Journal of Arid Land Studies, 34(2), 110–125.
Gonçalves, J. A., & Henriques, R. (2015). UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 104, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs. 2015.02.009
Grohmann, C. H., Garcia, G. P. B., Affonso, A. A., & Albuquerque, R. W. (2020).Dune migration and volume change from airborne LiDAR, terrestrial LiDAR and Structure from Motion–Multi View Stereo. Computers & Geosciences, 143, 1045569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.1045569
Grottoli, E., Biausque, M., Rogers, D., Jackson, D. W. T., & Cooper, J. A. G. (2021). Structure‑from‑Motion‑derived digital surface models from historical aerial photographs: A new 3D application for coastal dune monitoring. Remote Sensing, 13(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010095
Guillot, B., & Pouget, F. (2015). UAV application in coastal environment, example of the Oléron Island for dunes and dikes survey. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL‑3/W3, 321–326. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W3-321-2015
Hugenholtz, C. H., & Wolfe, S. A. (2012). Remote sensing and spatial analysis of aeolian sand dunes: A review and outlook. Earth‑Science Reviews, 111(3–4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.11.001
James, M. R., Robson, S., & Smith, M. W. (2017). Evaluating the precision and accuracy of structure-from-motion photogrammetry for geomorphic change detection. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(12), 2375–2395. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4125
Javernick, L., Brasington, J., & Caruso, B. (2014). Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure‑from‑Motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology, 213, 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.01.006
Khosravi, H., & Jafari, R. (2023). Aeolian geomorphology of ergs and dunefields in Iran: An overview. Desert, 28(1), 1–18. https://jdesert.ut.ac.ir/article_102461.html
Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J. R., Michaels, T. I., & Bou Karam, D. (2012). The physics of wind‑blown sand and dust. Reports on Progress in Physics, 75(10), 106901. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901
Lancaster, N. (1995). Geomorphology of desert dunes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842513
Laporte‑Fauret, Q., Castelle, B., Marieu, V., Bujan, S., Michalet, R., & Rosebery, D. (2020). Coastal dune morphology evolution combining LiDAR and UAV surveys, Truc Vert beach 2011–2019. Journal of Coastal Research, 95(sp1), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI95-032.1
Lia, A., & Han, Z. (2021). The moving trajectory fitting based on three-dimensional digital model of barchan dunes in Taklimakan Desert. Open Journal of Environmental Biology, 6(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.17352/ojeb.000022
Liu, D., Zhao, L., Gao, S., Yin, Z., & Li, R. (2018). High‑resolution UAV‑based mapping of topographic change in desert dunes using structure from motion photogrammetry. Aeolian Research, 34, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2018.07.004
Luppichini, M., Mancini, F., & Bianchini, G. (2025). Influences of the Ground Control Point Configuration on UAV-derived SfM in Coastal Environments. Journal of Coastal Research, 41(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-25-00023.1
Prodanov, B., Gussev, C., Sopotlieva, D., Valcheva, M., Bekova, R., Baltakova, A., Tzonev, R., & Popov, J. (2025). A standard procedure for dune mapping along the Bulgarian Black Sea coast: An integrated approach combining UAS photogrammetry, geomorphological and phytocoenological surveys. Frontiers in Marine Science, 12, 1579724. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1579724
Rahdari, M. R., & Rodríguez‑Seijo, A. (2021). Monitoring sand drift potential and sand dune mobility over the last three decades (Khartouran Erg, Sabzevar, NE Iran). Sustainability, 13(16), 9050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169050
Rotnicka, J., Dłużewski, M., Dąbski, M., Rodzewicz, M., Włodarski, W., & Zmarz, A. (2020). Accuracy of the UAV-based DEM of beach–foredune topography in relation to selected morphometric variables, land cover, and multitemporal sediment budget. Estuaries and Coasts, 43(8), 1939–1955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00751-y
Safi, S., & Naderi, A. (2023). Recent trends in sand dune activity in the Helmand-Sistan basin: A multi-source remote sensing approach. Studies in Drylands and Karst, 9(2), 91–110. https://oap.unige.ch/journals/sdk/article/view/1085
Smith, A., Jones, M., & Garcia, R. (2023). UAV photogrammetry for geomorphic change detection in arid environments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 291, 113437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113437
Smith, M. W., Carrivick, J. L., & Quincey, D. J. (2015). Structure-from-motion photogrammetry in physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography, 39(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133315615805
Solazzo, D., Sankey, J. B., Sankey, T. T., & Munson, S. M. (2018). Mapping and measuring aeolian sand dunes with photogrammetry and LiDAR from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and multispectral satellite imagery on the Paria Plateau, AZ, USA. Geomorphology, 319, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.07.023
Verduzco, P., & Hill, J. (2020). Quantifying volumetric change on coastal dunes using UAV‑derived DEMs and DoD analysis. Remote Sensing, 12(18), 2956. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12182956
Wang, M., Li, H., Liu, Y., & Li, H. (2025). Multi‑Source DEM vertical accuracy evaluation of Taklimakan Desert hinterland based on ICESat‑2 ATL08 and UAV data. Remote Sensing, 17(11), 1807. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17111807
Wiggs, G. F. S., Thomas, D. S. G., & Searle, R. B. (2006). Interactions between aeolian dunes and fluvial environments: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 80(3–4), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.03.008
Yang, Z., Qian, G., Dong, Z., Tian, M., & Lu, J. (2021). Migration of barchan dunes and factors that influence migration in the Sanlongsha dune field of the northern Kumtagh Sand Sea, China. Geomorphology, 378, 107615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107615
Yang, S., Lin, G., & Zevenbergen, C. (2019). Spatio-temporal migration patterns of barchan dunes in the Taklimakan Desert seen through remote sensing time series. Aeolian Research, 38, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2019.05.001
Zhang, L., Chen, Y., & Bao, W. (2024). Quantifying dune migration using UAV-based SfM in hyper-arid regions. Aeolian Research, 56, 100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2024.100866