پژوهشهای ژئومورفولوژی کمّی

پژوهشهای ژئومورفولوژی کمّی

ارزیابی خطر وقوع زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از تئوری کاتاستروف در حوضه آبریز زمکان کرمانشاه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استاد گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده‌ علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری ژئومورفولوژی، گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
3 دانشیار گروه منابع طبیعی و عضو پژوهشکده‌ مدیریت آب، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
10.22034/gmpj.2024.452001.1498
چکیده
زمین‌لغزش‌ها جزو مهم‌ترین مخاطرات ژئومورفولوژیکی در مناطق کوهستانی به‌شمار می‌روند. ارزیابی مکانی و تهیه نقشه‌های خطر راهکاری اساسی در رابطه با مدیریت ریسک زمین‌لغزش به‌شمار می‌رود. در پژوهش حاضر به ارزیابی مکانی و پهنه‌بندی خطر زمین‌لغرش در سطح حوضه آبریز زمکان کرمانشاه پرداخته شده است. در این راستا، از 13 فاکتور موثر بر وقوع زمین‌لغزش شامل ارتفاع، شیب، جهت شیب، عدد ناهمواری ملتون، تحدب سطح زمین، طول دامنه، عمق دره، رطوبت توپوگرافیک، بارش، سازندهای زمین‌شناسی، فاصله از آبراهه، فاصله از جاده و پوشش گیاهی استفاده شد. به‌منظور ترکیب و روی‌هم گذاری فاکتورهای مذکور از توابع تئوری کاتاستروف در بستر سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی (GIS) استفاده شد. مدل مذکور برای رفع عدم قطعیت‌های مرتبط با تصمیم‌گیری و کلاسه‌بندی داده‌ها به کار گرفته شد. در مدل مذکور وزن معیارها براساس مکانیسم درونی سیستم تعیین می‌شود که دارای ماهیت ریاضیاتی است. مدل‌سازی مبتنی بر توابع تئوری کاتاستروف نشان داد که فاکتورهای شیب با ضریب 3/1، بارش با ضریب 2/1، ارتفاع با ضریب 1/1 و سازندهای زمین‌شناسی با ضریب 1 مهم‌ترین متغیرهای مؤثر بر وقوع زمین‌لغزش در حوضه زمکان هستند. بالغ بر 4/32 درصد مساحت حوضه مطالعاتی در کلاس‌های با خطرپذیری زیاد و بسیار زیاد قرار گرفت. به‌دلیل برآیند عوامل موثر مانند ارتفاع، شیب و بارش زیاد و نیز تناوب مارن، آهک رسی و شیل، بخش‌های مرکزی و جنوبی منطقه از پتانسیل لغزشی بالایی برخوردار می‌باشند. نتایج بیانگر کارایی مطلوب توابع تئوری کاتاستروف مبتنی بر GIS در تهیه نقشه حساسیت وقوع زمین‌لغزش است که بر اساس منحنی مشخصه عملکرد سیستم (ROC)، دقت مدل حدود 90 درصد برآورد شده است. در مدل مورد استفاده وزن معیارها بر اساس مکانیسم درونی سیستم تعیین می‌شود و ضمن قابلیت تکرارپذیری و تعمیم منجر به کاهش عدم‌قطعیت و نیز ترکیب داده‌های کمی و کیفی می‌شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Assessment of landslide risk using catastrophe theory in Zemkan watershed, Kermanshah

نویسندگان English

Fariba Esfandiary Darabad 1
Ghobad Rostami 2
Raoof Mostafazadeh 3
Mousa Abedini 1
1 Professor, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Ph.D student, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
چکیده English

Extended Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Landslides are among the most important geomorphological hazards in mountainous areas. Large-scale landslides often have significant social and economic impacts, making them one of the costliest natural disasters worldwide, causing considerable damage to individuals and infrastructure each year. Nowadays, due to climate change and human activities, the frequency, intensity, and impact of landslides have increased, posing significant threats to life and property. In recent years, with rapid socio-economic development, the spatial extent of human activities has also gradually expanded. The occurrence of heavy rainfall has increased the frequency of landslides in mountainous areas and the resulting economic losses have gradually increased, turning landslides into barriers to human environment development. Given the complex physics and diverse nature of triggering mechanisms (such as rainfall and earthquakes), dynamic landslide monitoring is vital for risk assessment and management. While small landslides constitute the majority of landslide events annually, large landslides are usually responsible for a significant portion of casualties and damages. In most parts of the world, identifying their locations and effects still faces many challenges due to the diversity of landslide types and morphologies, as well as the difficulty in collecting and updating survey forms. Therefore, the development of tools and techniques for identifying and monitoring these widespread gravitational processes is of great importance. Spatial assessment and preparation of hazard maps are fundamental strategies in landslide risk management. In the present study, spatial assessment and zoning of landslide risk in the Zemkan watershed in Kermanshah have been addressed. This watershed drains parts of the western slopes of the Zagros Mountainous area and has a high potential for landslides.

Methodology: In order to assess the spatial risk of landslides in the watershed, studies of 13 factors affecting landslide occurrence were conducted, including elevation, slope, aspect, the Melton ruggedness number, surface convexity, length of slope, valley depth, TWI, precipitation, geological formations, distance from streams, distance from roads, and vegetation cover. In line with the research objectives, the necessary data were obtained from 1:25,000 and 1:50,000 topographic maps; 1:100,000 and 1:250,000 geological maps; Aster satellite images with a resolution of 27 meters; Sentinel satellite images (with a resolution of 10 meters) and Google Earth (GeoEye with an approximate resolution of 1 meter); climate data; field studies; and library resources. ArcGIS, ENVI, and SAGA GIS software were used for the preparation and preparation of thematic layers and the execution of research models. A catastrophe theory-based approach was employed for zoning and spatial prediction of landslide occurrence risk in the Zemkan watershed area. Functions of catastrophe theory were used in GIS environment to combine and overlay these factors. The model employed was used to address uncertainties associated with decision-making and data classification. In this model, the weight of criteria is determined by the internal mechanism of the system, which has a mathematical nature.



Results and discussion: The results of the research demonstrate the satisfactory performance of catastrophe theory functions in zoning the risk of landslides. The model accuracy, calculated using field mapping of landslide zones and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, was approximately 90%. Catastrophe theory-based modeling showed that slope factors with a coefficient of 1.3, precipitation with a coefficient of 1.2, elevation with a coefficient of 1.1, and geological formations with a coefficient of 1 are the most important variables affecting landslide occurrence in the Zemkan watershed. Over 32.4% of the study area fell into high and very high susceptibility classes. Several conditions have led to significant portions of the central and southern parts of the Zemkan watershed having a high landslide potential. In this regard, factors such as high elevation and slope, significant precipitation, the presence of landslide-sensitive geological formations such as marl, clayey limestone, and shale (Kazhomi formation), westward orientation perpendicular to westward winds, long slopes, high drainage density, and human interventions are noteworthy.

Conclusion: In the present study, a model based on catastrophe theory was utilized to mitigate uncertainties associated with decision-making and data classification. In this model, the weights of criteria are determined by the internal mechanism of the system, which has a mathematical nature. The results of the model are repeatable and generalizable, thereby reducing decision-making uncertainties and enabling the integration of multiple quantitative and qualitative data. The research findings indicate the effectiveness of catastrophe theory functions based on GIS in spatial assessment and zoning of landslide risk in the study area. The alignment of landslide field mapping with landslide risk zoning maps and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicates a model accuracy of approximately 90%. The model results show that slope, precipitation, elevation, and geology are the most important factors influencing landslide occurrence in the Zemkan watershed. A significant portion of the study area falls into high and very high susceptibility classes of landslides, indicating a considerable potential for landslides in the Zemkan watershed and the need for planning to mitigate the risks associated with landslide occurrence.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Landslide
Zonation
Catastrophe theory
GIS
Zemkan watershed
اصغری سراسکانرود، صیاد.، امامی، راشد.، و پیروزی، الناز. (1400). ارزیابی و پهنه‌بندی خطر زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از روش‌های OWA و ANN (مطالعه‌ی موردی: شهرستان پاوه). مخاطرات محیط طبیعی, 10(28), 131-150. doi: 10.22111/jneh.2021.33729.1645
اصغری سراسکانرود، صیاد.، بلواسی، ایمانعلی. (1397). مقایسه مدل شبکه عصبی مصنوعی با مدل منطق فازی در ارزیابی خطر زمین‌لغزش (مطالعه موردی حوضه آبریز سیمره چنار). پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 7(2)، 158-182. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22519424.1397.7.2.9.5
آرین تبار، حبیب.، شرفی، سیامک.، نگهبان،  سعید. (1399). ارزیابی روش جمع کیفی (QS) جهت تعیین گامای بهینه در تهیه نقشه پهنه‌بندی خطر زمین لغزش (مطالعه موردی: جنگل توسکستان تا گرگان). پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 9(3)، 70-87. doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2020.223877.1161
پورفراش‌زاده، فهیمه.، اصغری سراسکانرود، صیاد. (1401). ارزیابی و پهنه‌بندی حساسیت وقوع زمین‌لغزش با استفاده از روش آماری در حوضه آبخیز بالیخلی (ایستگاه یامچی). جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، 11(2): 41-59. doi: 10.22067/geoeh.2021.72256.1103
خیری‌زاده آروق، منصور. 1395. تحلیل مورفودینامیک و تغییرات جانبی مجرای رودخانه زرینه‌رود (از شاهین‌دژ تا دریاچه ارومیه). رساله دکتری، دانشکده جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشگاه تبریز.
خیری‌زاده آروق، منصور؛ اسمعیل‌پور، مرضیه. 1400. کاربرد توابع تئوری کاتاستروف در مکان‌یابی بهینه توسعه مکانی شهرها براساس متغیرها و مخاطرات طبیعی (مورد: کلان‌شهر تبریز). جغرافیا و توسعه، شماره 62، صص 1-30.
سرائی، بهناز.، اصغری سراسکانرود، صیاد. 1400. پهنه بندی خطر زمین لغزش در حوضه آبخیز نکارود با استفاده از منطق فازی و سنجش از راه دور. تخریب و احیاء اراضی طبیعی، ۲ (۴) :۵۲-۶۷.
یوسفی روشن، محمدرضا.، عمونیا، حمید (1401). برآورد سطح پوشش گیاهی شهرستان بابلسر با استفاده از شاخص تفاضلی پوشش گیاهی نرمال شده (NDVI). جغرافیای طبیعی، پیاپی 57، 127-139.
Zhang, X., Yang, X., Li, Y., He, X., Lv, G., Yang, J. 2017. Influence of edaphic factors on plant distribution and diversity in the arid area of Xinjiang, Northwest China. Arid Land Research and Management, Vol. 32, Issue 1, 38-56.
-Abdollahzadeh, A., Ownegh, M., Sadoddin, A., & Mostafazadeh, R. (2016). Comparison of two landslide-prone area determination methods in Ziarat Watershed, Golestan Province. Emergency Management, 5(1), 5-13.
-Ahmed, Kamal; Shahid, Shamsuddin; Bin Harun, Sobri; Ismail, Tarmizi; Nawaz, Nadeem; Shamsudin, Supiah. 2015. Assessment of groundwater potential zones in an arid region based on catastrophe theory. Earth Science Informatics, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, pp. 539-549.
-Aleotti. P and Chowdhury. R. 1999. Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Env 58: 21-44.
-Ayalew. L and Yamagishi. H. 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65: 15–31.
-Broeckx, J., Rossi, M., Lijen, K., Campforts, B., Poesen, J., Vanmaercke, M. 2020. Landslide mobilization rates: a global analysis and model. Earth Sci. Rev. 201, 102972.
-Dilley, R., et al. 2005. Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis. World Bank Group, Washington, D.C.
-Duman TY, Can T, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H. 2006. Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environ Geol 51:241–256.
-Fan, X., Scaringi, G., Korup, O., West, A.J., Van Westen, C.J., Tanyas, H., Hovius, N., Hales, T.C., Jibson, R.W., Allstadt, K.E., Zhang, L., Evans, S.G., Xu, C., Li, G., Pei, X., Xu, Q., Huang, R. 2019. Earthquake-induced chains of geologic hazards: patterns, mechanisms, and impacts. Rev. Geophys. 57, 421–503.
-Froude, M.J., Petley, D. 2018. Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 18 (8), 2161–2181.
-Gariano, S.L., Guzzetti, F. 2016. Landslides in a changing climate. Earth-Science Reviews 162, 227–252.
-Ghorbani, A., Mostafazadeh, R., Zabihi, M., & Jafari Roodsari, M. (2023). GIS-based Determining the Landslide hotspot Occurrence using Getis-Ord Index in Gharnaveh Watershed, Golestan Province. Hydrogeomorphology, 10(36), 18-1. doi: 10.22034/hyd.2023.55449.1679
-Gomez, H., and T. Kavzoglu. 2005. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial lneural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela, Engineering Geology, 78(1–2): 11–27.
-Grozavu A, Plescan S, Patriche CV, Margarint MC, Rosca B. 2013. Landslide susceptibility assessment: GIS application to a complex mountainous environment. In: The Carpathians: Integrating nature and society towards sustainability, Environ Sci Eng, pp 31–44.
-Guha-Sapir, D., Hoyois, P., Wallemacq, P., Below, R. 2017. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2016: the Numbers and Trends. CRED, p. 91 p.
-Hansen A, Franks CAM, Kirk PA, Brimicombe AJ, Tung F. 1995. Application of GIS to hazard assessment, with particular reference to landslidesin Hong Kong. In: Carrara A, Guzzetti F (eds) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 135–175.
-Highland, L. & Bobrowsky, P. 2008. The Lan–slide Handbook - A Guide to Understanding Landslides. In: Geological Survey Circular 1325. Reston, Virginia, U.S: US Geological Survey.
-Hungr, O., Leroueil, S., Picarelli, L. 2014. The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11, 167–194.
-Lee S, Choi J, Min K. 2002. Landslide susceptibility analysis and verification using the Bayesian probability model. Environ Geol 43:120–131.
-Luca, Federica; Conforti, Massimo; Robustelli, Gaetano. 2011. Comparison of GIS-based gullying susceptibility mapping using bivariate and multivariate statistics: Northern Calabria, South Italy. Geomorphology, 134: 297-308.
-Ma F, Wang J, Yuan R, Zhao H, Guo J. 2013. Application of analytical hierarchy process and leastsquares method for landslide susceptibility assessment along the Zhong-Wu natural gas pipeline. China; Landslides 10(4):481–492.
-Magliulo P, Di Lisio A, Russo F, Zelano A. 2008. Geomorphology and landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and bivariate statistics, a case study in southern Italy. Nat Hazards 47:411–435.
-Nadim, F., Kjekstad, O., Peduzzi, P., Herold, C., Jaedicke, C. 2006. Global landslide and avalanche hotspots. Landslides 3 (2), 159–173.
-Ponziani, Francesco., Ciuffi, Pierpaolo., Bayer, Benedikt., Berni, Nicola., Franceschini, Silvia., Simoni, Alessandro. 2023. Regional-scale InSAR investigation and landslide early warning thresholds in Umbria, Italy. Engineering Geology 327 (2023) 107352, pp. 1-17.
-Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B.D., Mihir, M., Guzzetti, F. 2018. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Sci. Rev. 180, 60–91.
-Restrepo C, Álvarez N. 2006. Landslides and their contribution to land cover in the mountain of Mexico and Central America. Biotropica 38:446–457.
-Rohan, T., Shelef, E., Mirus, B., Coleman, T. 2023. Prolonged influence of urbanization on landslide susceptibility. Landslides.
-Sidle RC, Ochiai H. 2006. Landslide processes, predictions and land use, American geographical union. Water Res 18:312.
-Sim, K.B., Lee, M.L., Wong, S.Y. 2022. A review of landslide acceptable risk and tolerable risk. Geoenvironmental Disasters 9 (1), 3.
-Stern M. 1995. Vegetative recovery on earthquake triggered landslide sites in the Ecuadorian Andes. In: Churchill SP, Balslev H, Forero E, Luteyn JL (eds) Biodiversity and conservation of neotropicalmontane forests. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, pp 207–220.
-Talebi Khiavi, H., & Mostafazadeh, R. (2022). The spatiotemporal dependencies of terrain indices with soil characteristics in a steep hillslope mountainous area. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(10), 937.
-Van Westen, C. J & Soeters, R. 1998. Geographic information systems in slope instability zonation (GISSIZ). ITC. 156p.
-Wu, Wenfu., Guo, Songjing., Shao, Zhenfeng. 2023. Landslide risk evaluation and its causative factors in typical mountain environment of China: a case study of Yunfu City. Ecological Indicators 154 (2023) 110821, pp. 1.13.
-Xiao-jun, Wang; Jian-yun, Zhang; Shahid, Shamsuddin; Xing-hui, Xia; Rui-min, He; Man-ting, Shang. 2014. Catastrophe theory to assess water security and adaptation strategy in the context of environmental change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. Vol. 19, Issue. 4, pp. 463-477.